Bioethics Panel Finalizes Advice for Synthetic Biology
By Jocelyn Kaiser,
Science Insider
| 11. 17. 2010
A presidential bioethics commission concluded this week that the U.S. government should not clamp down too hard on research on synthetic biology. But the commission struggled with what to do about amateur synthetic biologists who aren't covered by current regulations.
Formed in April, the 12-member Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues has spent 5 months on its first assignment: examining the benefits and concerns raised by the insertion of a synthetic genome into a bacterium by biologist J. Craig Venter, whose team then coaxed it to replicate using the new DNA. In July and September, the panel heard from various experts who discussed the science, moral implications, and safety concerns, including pleas for more oversight of so-called do-it-yourselfers.
The commission met yesterday and today in Atlanta to wrap up a report due on 15 December. Members emphasized the need to strike a balance between what they called "letting science rip" and the precautionary principle of not allowing any science to be done until all risks are understood. The panel has chosen "prudent vigilance." Explains co-chair James Wagner, president...
Related Articles
By Katie Hunt, CNN | 07.30.2025
Scientists are exploring ways to mimic the origins of human life without two fundamental components: sperm and egg.
They are coaxing clusters of stem cells – programmable cells that can transform into many different specialized cell types – to form...
By John H. Evans, Craig Callender, Neal K. Devaraj, Farren J. Isaacs, and Gregory E. Kaebnick, Issues in Science and Technology | 07.04.2025
The controversy around a ban on “mirror life” should lead to a more nuanced public conversation about how to manage the benefits and risks of precursor biotechnologies.
About five years ago, the five of us formed a discussion group to...
By Pallab Gosh and Gwyndaf Hughes, BBC News | 06.26.2025
Work has begun on a controversial project to create the building blocks of human life from scratch, in what is believed to be a world first.
The research has been taboo until now because of concerns it could lead to...
By Carsten T. Charlesworth, Henry T. Greely, and Hiromitsu Nakauchi, MIT Technology Review | 03.25.2025
Why do we hear about medical breakthroughs in mice, but rarely see them translate into cures for human disease? Why do so few drugs that enter clinical trials receive regulatory approval? And why is the waiting list for organ transplantation...