Ban Human Cloning Right Now
By Judy Norsigian and Stuart Newman,
Boston Globe
| 08. 03. 2001
On Tuesday the US House of Representatives passed a bill that
would ban the cloning of human embryos and thus curtail certain
forms of stem cell research. The two of us, a women's health
activist and a prochoice biologist, provided testimony before
a congressional committee last month in favor of this bill.
Why would political progressives and defenders of reproductive
autonomy advocate restricting what some have characterized as
an area of medicine with great promise, thus finding ourselves
on the same side of the issue as antichoice conservatives? We
believe that any benefits that may result from stem cell research
that utilizes ''clonal embryos,'' that is, genetic duplicates
of existing individuals, would be far outweighed by the threats
to women's health and to our sense of our humanity posed by
creation of such embryos.
Because clonal human embryos could be used for experimental
purposes and ultimately as sources of donor-matched embryo stem
cells, some researchers and biotechnology companies have been
resisting any restrictions on their ability to produce them.
Recently, Advanced Cell Technology in Worcester announced that
it has already...
Related Articles
By Gaia Ghirardi, Arno Van Hootegem & K. Paige Harden , Nature Human Behaviour | 09.21.2026
Embryo screening for behavioural traits is no longer speculative. If you want to become a parent in the USA today, you can pay to use pre-implantation polygenic testing (PGT-P) of in vitro fertilization (IVF)-created embryos. PGT-P promises to optimize offspring...
By Ann E. Marimow and J. David Goodman, The New York Times | 09.22.2026
Justice Elena Kagan on Tuesday refused to intervene in a high-profile custody battle that involved difficult questions surrounding surrogacy and abortion, leaving in place a lower-court order that gave custody to the biological parents in the dispute.
The case drew...
By Gay Pasley, Essence | 09.04.2026
That is what makes the unfolding case of McKenna West so important. It is more than a disagreement about abortion or a dispute over a surrogacy contract. It asks whether an agreement signed before a pregnancy can become authority...
By Ava Kofman, The New Yorker | 09.15.2026
A WOMAN WHO ACTS AS A SURROGATE, carrying a child for someone else, is said to be going on a “journey.”
Kayla Elliott started her surrogacy journey at the age of twenty-six. She gave birth to a baby girl for...