America: Research and Reproductive Cloning
By CNN/USA Today/Gallup,
CNN/USA Today/Gallup
| 11. 26. 2001
| |
Approve
|
Disapprove
|
No opinion
|
| Do you approve or disapprove of cloning that is designed specifically to result in the birth of a human being? |
9
|
88
|
3
|
| Do you approve or disapprove of cloning that is not designed specifically to result in the birth of a human being, but is designed to aid medical research that might find treatments for certain diseases? |
54
|
41
|
5
|
| - 50 years old |
~60 |
|
|
| - > 50 years old |
46 |
|
|
| - Liberals |
64 |
|
|
| - Moderates |
62 |
|
|
| - Conservatices |
44 |
|
|
Related Articles
By Abby McCloskey, The Dallas Morning News | 10.10.2025
We Texans like to do things our way — leave some hide on the fence rather than stay corralled, as goes a line in Wallace O. Chariton’s Texas dictionary This Dog’ll Hunt. Lately, I’ve been wondering what this ethos...
By Jallicia A. Jolly, Sydney Curtis and Nicole Sessions, Ms. Magazine | 10.17.2025
Pronatalism is an old idea with roots in eugenics and nationalism, that is now fashionable among far-right influencers and policymakers. They talk of “moral decay” and see low birth rates as a threat to the future of humanity. In the mainstream media...
By Vuyile Madwantsi, Independent Online | 08.22.2025
Imagine this: a future where parents could choose their baby’s eye colour, height or even intelligence.
Sounds like science fiction, right? But it’s closer than you think.
Let’s start with a simple, human truth: most of us want healthy children...
By Jacob Bogage, The Washington Post | 09.03.2025
The conservative group behind the Project 2025 governing playbook for President Donald Trump’s second term is set to propose sweeping revisions to U.S. economic policy meant to encourage married heterosexual couples to have more children.
The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing...
