America: Research and Reproductive Cloning
By CNN/USA Today/Gallup,
CNN/USA Today/Gallup
| 11. 26. 2001
| |
Approve
|
Disapprove
|
No opinion
|
| Do you approve or disapprove of cloning that is designed specifically to result in the birth of a human being? |
9
|
88
|
3
|
| Do you approve or disapprove of cloning that is not designed specifically to result in the birth of a human being, but is designed to aid medical research that might find treatments for certain diseases? |
54
|
41
|
5
|
| - 50 years old |
~60 |
|
|
| - > 50 years old |
46 |
|
|
| - Liberals |
64 |
|
|
| - Moderates |
62 |
|
|
| - Conservatices |
44 |
|
|
Related Articles
By Emile P. Torres, Truthdig | 04.27.2026
The CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman, is on a messianic mission to bring about the singularity, the moment at which artificial intelligence begins to self-improve. If AI is smart enough to build the next generation of even smarter AI...
By Marcelo Jauregui-Volpe, Wired | 04.24.2026
Two companies that launched last year with plans to create gene-edited babies have already shut down, citing money issues and internal conflict.
One of them, Manhattan Genomics of New York, closed abruptly shortly after announcing a team of scientific advisers...
By Abby Vesoulis, Mother Jones | 04.18.2026
Two years ago, we devoted an entire issue to the rise of the American oligarchy. Since then, our oligarchic system has become more entrenched and pervasive, revolving around a small crew of tech titans whose quest for wealth and...
By John Donvan, WNYC and Open to Debate [with Marcy Darnovsky] | 04.23.2026
For complete introduction see Substack
Some call it eugenics, an unsettling step toward a world of “designer babies” reserved for the privileged. Others see something very different: a transformative scientific advance with the potential to prevent devastating genetic diseases before...
