Why Environmentalists Should Be Concerned
By Bill McKibben,
WorldWatch
| 06. 30. 2002
July / August 2002
It's not as if environmentalists really need something new to worry about. The planet's temperature is set to rise four or five degrees-every glacial system is already in rapid retreat, and icebergs measured in units of U.S. states (the size of Rhode Island!) are calving off the Antarctic. Species disappear daily; acid rain; and you know the whole damn litany. We could be forgiven for wanting to take a pass on human genetic engineering.
And yet I think it may turn into the single greatest battle environmentalists have ever fought, the one for which the Grand Canyon and the African elephants and Amazon deforestation and Love Canal were preparing us. The real test.
Some of the reasons for thinking so are pragmatic. Changing the human germline is an almost preposterous override of the precautionary principle, the idea that if you don't know something's safe you shouldn't do it. We have rushed with blinding speed through the first phases of the biotechnological revolution-what was experimental a decade ago now grows in half the corn and soybean fields...
Related Articles
By Jessica Hamzelou, MIT Technology Review | 07.30.2026
As of this week in Montana, any biotech company with an experimental drug has a clear path to selling it to consumers. Companies whose drugs have been through preliminary testing—sometimes in as few as 10 healthy people—can pay $12,500 to...
By Sophie Ryall , BioNews | 08.03.2026
A fertility doctor is being sued for using his own sperm during artificial insemination procedures without the patient's knowledge or consent.
Dr Dennis Lutz used his own sperm repeatedly when treating patient Jean Ann Nelson at the Medical Arts Clinic...
By John Travis , Science | 07.27.2026
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine over the weekend said it would launch a “comprehensive investigation” into the previously undisclosed death last year of a 6-year-old girl who had received an experimental gene therapy from one of its scientists...
By Edward Chen, Nature | 07.28.2026
A small number of fertility clinics around the world are offering a controversial treatment: a procedure to furnish clients’ embryos with donated mitochondria as a way to increase the chances of taking home a baby.
The method, called mitochondrial replacement...