Using 23andMe to Reunite Families at the Border Comes With Serious Privacy Risks
By Tonya Riley, Mother Jones [Cites CGS' Marcy Darnovsky] | 06. 22. 2018
On Wednesday, President Donald Trump announced an end to administration’s policy of separating families at the border. But the administration hasn’t figured out how to reunite the parents and children that have already been split apart. A day after Trump’s announcement, Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) suggested a novel idea: recruit 23andMe, the DNA-testing company, to help separated families find missing relatives. The company itself quickly volunteered its services for the cause. But legal and genetic experts say that the solution might cause more harm than good.
Speier told Buzzfeed News on Thursday that she spoke with executives at 23andMe, which is headquartered in the congresswoman’s district, about providing testing assistance to reunite families at the border. By Thursday evening, 23andMe CEO Anne Wojcicki said that the company “would welcome any opportunity to help” and was “waiting to see the best way to follow up and make it happen.” (23andMe donated $5,000 to Speier’s 2016 campaign.)
“I implore the President, Attorney General Sessions, and HHS Secretary Azar to accept this generous and altruistic offer, particularly in light of the fact that...
Related Articles
By Roberto Andorno and Alicia Ely Yamin, Open Global Rights | 01.08.2019
The gene-editing scandal that made headlines in late November, with researcher He Jiankui claiming to have created twin girls whose DNA he had altered at the embryo stage, heightened global awareness of a consequential and close-at-hand decision about how...
By Marcia Frellick, Medscape [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.18.2018
The World Health Organization (WHO) is creating a global panel to study human gene editing and the scientific, legal, social, and ethical challenges that surround it so the organization may move toward standards for oversight and governance.
The multidisciplinary panel...
By Jing-Bao Nie, Neil Pickering, Hastings Bioethics Forum | 12.13.2018
When the world’s first research on editing the genes of human embryos by Chinese scientists was published in an international journal in 2015, a report in the New York Timescharacterised the key issue involved as “a scientific ethical divide...
By Maggie Koerth-Baker, FiveThirtyEight | 12.10.2018
How do you stop a mad scientist?
We’ve been doing it in fiction for centuries. Doctor Faustus was carried off to hell. Pneumonia and an Arctic ice flow ended Victor Frankenstein. Doctor Moreau’s own creations ultimately did him...
