Human Genome Editing: Our Future Belongs to All of Us
By Françoise Baylis,
Issues in Science and Technology
| 05. 15. 2019
In late November 2018, the Chinese scientist He Jiankui ignited a media firestorm with the birth announcement of “healthy” twin girls, Lulu and Nana (pseudonyms), born following germline genome editing to provide resistance to HIV. This announcement was followed by swift and nearly unanimous condemnation. A common theme among the critics was He’s failure to respect international consensus.
As a strong and steady advocate of “broad societal consensus” as the threshold for ethically acceptable heritable human genome editing, I was intrigued by this response. What is this “consensus” whereof they speak?
A quick review of media reports and various commentaries chastising He for having violated international consensus suggests considerable equivocation about the scope and meaning of consensus. Some commentators referred to a perceived political consensus, others intuited a somewhat amorphous scientific consensus, and a few others complained of a failure to respect the call for broad societal consensus issued in December 2015 at the International Summit on Human Gene Editing.
POLITICAL CONSENSUS
Globally, the political consensus on heritable human genome editing—such as it is—inclines toward an outright ban, and...
Related Articles
By Maggie Astor, The New York Times | 06.23.2026
Every year, patients undergo millions of in vitro fertilization procedures worldwide. Only a minority result in a live birth.
In an effort to improve the odds, scientists have developed an array of “add-ons” that could in theory identify the most...
By Carl Zimmer and Catrin Einhorn, The New York Times | 06.25.2026
The Trump administration and a company that is promising to bring long-gone animals back from extinction announced a partnership on Thursday to preserve cells, tissue and DNA from threatened and endangered species.
The company, Colossal Biosciences, said its goal was...
By Marisa Flook , BioNews | 06.29.2026
An anti-ageing gene therapy not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is set to be offered by an American company at overseas clinics outside of US jurisdiction.
The treatment, developed by Minicircle from Austin, Texas, uses a...
By Philip Ball , Nature | 06.17.2026
Our genomes are full of mutations that have the potential to damage our health or even kill us. Yet most of them rarely cause problems. Why? It’s partly thanks to a family of proteins that mask, or ‘buffer’, the ill...
