UK Medical Research Regulators Spared the Axe
By Daniel Cressey,
Nature News Blog
| 07. 18. 2013
The future of the UK regulating bodies for human-embryo and human-tissue research has been safeguarded, as the government’s announcement yesterday that the two bodies will continue to exist brings a long-running saga to an end.
Back in 2010 the government said that it would axe the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), which regulates research on human embryos and fertility treatment. The Human Tissue Authority (HTA), which regulates other human tissue research and organ donation, was also to be wound up. The proposals were unpopular with many researchers, and
earlier this year the Department of Health announced that instead it would commission an independent review to see whether the two bodies could be merged.
That review —
published yesterday — found that there was “relatively little overlap” in the work of the two regulators and they should continue as separate bodies. This outcome has been
accepted by the government.
There will be some changes for researchers. Regulation of tissue used for developing medicinal products is to be transferred from the HTA to the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory...
Related Articles
By Anna Collinson and Jo Adnitt, BBC | 08.18.2026
At least 30 children, most of them British, are feared to have been conceived by IVF treatment in northern Cyprus using the wrong sperm or egg donors.
In each case, the parents suspect they did not get the donors they...
What We Inherit by Sam Trejo and Daphne O. Martschenko; and Original Sin by Kathryn Paige Harden have a great deal in common, with substantial differences in style and emphasis. Both books attempt, in different ways, to show the reader just where current research into human genomics stands, where that might be going, and why the authors are interested. In short, the influence of genomic research on our societies is already large and seems likely to change them in ways...
By Dan Falk, Nautilus | 08.20.2026
The pseudoscience of eugenics, founded on the mistaken notion that nature envisions some “right” combination of genes, and that selective breeding can improve the human race, is making a comeback. While the heyday of eugenics was a century ago, the...
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross, MedPage Today | 08.18.2026
Few things evoke a greater sense of desperation than a parent seeking an experimental treatment for their child. That desperation can make even extraordinary risks seem worth taking. This dynamic has come into stark relief after Mei, a 6-year-old girl...