Too Clever Too Fast Too Happy
By Bill McKibben,
The Guardian
| 05. 03. 2003
For the first few miles of the marathon, I was still fresh
enough to look around, to pay attention. I remember mostly the
muffled thump of several thousand pairs of expensive sneakers
padding the Ottawa pavement. But as the race wore on, the herd
stretched into a long string of solitary runners. Pretty soon
each of us was off in a singular race, pitting one body against
one will. For months I'd trained with the arbitrary goal of
three hours and 20 minutes in my mind. Which is not a fast time,
but it would let a 41-year-old into the Boston marathon. And
given how fast I'd gone in training, I knew it lay at the outer
edge of the possible.
By about, say, mile 23, two things were becoming clear. One,
my training had worked: I'd reeled off one 7:30 mile after another.
Two, my training wouldn't get me to the finish by itself. With
every hundred yards the race became less a physical test and
more a mental one. Someone stronger passed me, and I slipped
on to...
Related Articles
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
By Emile Torres, Jacobin | 11.15.2025
Watching tech moguls throw caution to the wind in the AI arms race or equivocate on whether humanity ought to continue, it’s natural to wonder whether they care about human lives.
The earnest, in-depth answer to this question is just...
Public domain portrait of James D. Watson by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
and the National Human Genome Research Institute on Wikimedia Commons
James Watson, a scientist famous for ground-breaking work on DNA and notorious for expressing his antediluvian opinions, died on November 6, at the age of 97. Watson’s scientific eminence was primarily based on the 1953 discovery of the helical structure of DNA, for which he, Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins shared the 1962 Nobel Prize in Physiology or...
Paula Amato & Shoukhrat Mitalipov
[OHSU News/Christine Torres Hicks]
On September 30th, a team of 21 scientists from Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) published a significant paper in Nature Communications, with a scientifically accurate but, to many, somewhat abstruse headline:
Induction of experimental cell division to generate cells with reduced chromosome ploidy
The lead authors were Shoukhrat Mitalipov, recently described here as “a push-the-envelope biologist,” and his long-term colleague Paula Amato. (Recall that in July the pair had co-published with...