These cuts to forensic research will not combat violent crime
By Susan R. Paisner,
Washington Post [Letter to the Editor]
| 07. 04. 2017
I suppose by this point I shouldn’t be surprised by anything the Trump administration does relating to science. But as a criminologist, I found myself stunned to read that Attorney General Jeff Sessions decided not to renew the National Commission on Forensic Science, which holds the responsibility for raising forensic standards [“Scientists defend panel on forensics,” PowerPost, June 30].
The article said, “Sessions, a former federal prosecutor, has said he wanted to ensure that Obama-era priorities did not counter Trump administration goals of combating violent crime and promoting police safety and morale.” Seriously? The administration’s 2018 budget would cut the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s funding by nearly 50 percent. NIST had just started a research effort to “increase the reliability of techniques that are used more than 100,000 times a year in U.S. crime labs.” This proposed budget would, among other things, eliminate a new research center and cut DNA-related and forensic programs.
Two questions, Mr. Sessions: First, are you actually stating that the Obama-era priorities were intended to increase violent crime and reduce police safety...
Related Articles
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Emily Galpern] | 03.29.2026
More Americans are turning to surrogacy to build their families, as the practice becomes more common and more publicly discussed.
Why it matters: As surrogacy becomes more visible and accessible, ethical, legal and cultural tensions become harder to ignore...
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Surrogacy360] | 03.29.2026
Without a federal law, surrogacy in the U.S. is governed by a patchwork of state regulations/
Why it matters: Confusing, varied local rules can determine everything from whether agreements are legally binding to who is recognized as a parent at...
Cathy Tie seems to be good at starting businesses but not so dedicated to maintaining them. CGS, like many others, first heard of her thanks to Caiwei Chen and Antonio Regalado in MIT Technology Review, May 2025, as the partner (perhaps bride) of the notorious Chinese scientist He Jiankui, described in the headline as “China’s Frankenstein.” He prefers “Chinese Darwin.” She ran his Twitter account for a while, contributing such gems as:
Get in luddite, we’re going gene editing...
By Laura DeFrancesco, Nature Biotechnology | 03.17.2026
The first gene editors designed to fix genetic lesions in mutation-agnostic ways are poised to enter the clinic. Tessera Therapeutics and Alltrna, two Flagship Pioneering-funded companies, are gearing up to test novel genetic medicines in humans. Tessera received regulatory clearance...