These cuts to forensic research will not combat violent crime
By Susan R. Paisner,
Washington Post [Letter to the Editor]
| 07. 04. 2017
I suppose by this point I shouldn’t be surprised by anything the Trump administration does relating to science. But as a criminologist, I found myself stunned to read that Attorney General Jeff Sessions decided not to renew the National Commission on Forensic Science, which holds the responsibility for raising forensic standards [“Scientists defend panel on forensics,” PowerPost, June 30].
The article said, “Sessions, a former federal prosecutor, has said he wanted to ensure that Obama-era priorities did not counter Trump administration goals of combating violent crime and promoting police safety and morale.” Seriously? The administration’s 2018 budget would cut the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s funding by nearly 50 percent. NIST had just started a research effort to “increase the reliability of techniques that are used more than 100,000 times a year in U.S. crime labs.” This proposed budget would, among other things, eliminate a new research center and cut DNA-related and forensic programs.
Two questions, Mr. Sessions: First, are you actually stating that the Obama-era priorities were intended to increase violent crime and reduce police safety...
Related Articles
By Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 06.04.2026
Scientists at Columbia University have edited the DNA of early human embryos with unprecedented accuracy, an achievement that could open the way to babies engineered with particular characteristics.
The prospect has fueled controversy for years. On the one hand, the...
By Alexandre Piquard, Le Monde [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 05.22.2026
"If proven to be safe, we believe preventive gene editing could be one of the most important health technologies of the century." This is how Lucas Harrington explained the goal of his company Preventive: to create genetically modified babies. Trying...
By Daniel Shanahan, Los Angeles Review of Books | 05.31.2026
This is the 15th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. You can read the first part here. The series...
By Sofia Resnick, Stateline | 05.20.2026
An anti-abortion group last month sued seven Utah fertility clinics, claiming their disposal of embryos as part of the in vitro fertilization process violates the state’s wrongful death law.
The ministry Voice for the Voiceless believes it has a strong...