Sustainable Week: Fixing Our Broken Moral Compass
By Chuck Stern,
BTRtoday
| 07. 08. 2016
[citing CGS’ Elliot Hosman]
What if we could fix a broken moral compass? According to bioethicist and sociologist James J. Hughes of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, we're already there.
In a provocative piece published in the Washington Post last month, Hughes cites dopamine-stimulating ADHD medications as current examples of "moral enhancement," and argues that other treatments like gene therapies and implants will soon follow, even if usage "will not be voluntary."
If this sounds unsettling, you are not alone. Elliot Hosman of the Center for Genetics and Society, who previously spoke to BTRtoday about this "socially dangerous" slope, weighs in on Hughes' claims.
Hosman believes that the field of behavioral genetics is fraught with biases, mishaps, and "conflicts of interest that warp the scientific process." They assert that Hughes' characterizations are "reductive" in the way that they misrepresent the nuances of the field; while Hughes believes that "criminality" and "sexual promiscuity" are genetically predetermined, Hosman insists that this is contradicted by both genetics and the social sciences. They further warn of "genetic determinism," the notion that there is "inherent value" in...
Related Articles
By Nicholas Wade, The New York Times | 04.30.2026
“J. Craig Venter” via Wikimedia Commons licensed under CC by 2.5
J. Craig Venter, a scientist and entrepreneur who raced to decode the human genome, died on Wednesday in San Diego. He was 79.
His death was announced by...
By Jonathan Basile, Los Ángeles Review of Books | 04.29.2026
WILLIAM BATESON, a foundational figure in the science of genetics at the turn of the last century, once recounted the response of a Scottish soldier to one of his public lectures: “Sir, what ye’re telling us is nothing but Scientific...
By Alex Aylward, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, and Gregory Radick , Heredity | 04.20.2026
Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it...
By Staff, GMWatch | 03.28.2026
Following a recent podcast interview we were asked whether there is any solid scientific research looking at how gene expression or molecular composition in genetically modified (GM) plants differs from conventionally bred plants. As this is an interesting and important...