Some Data, Please
By Genome Web,
Genome Web
| 01. 08. 2014
A company and its former subsidiary have settled with the US Federal Trade Commission, which said the companies' advertising claims regarding their genetically tailored nutritional supplements and skincare products were deceptive.
In their marketing material, GeneLink and Foru said that their customized products - customers sent in cheek swabs for genetic analysis - could help overcome genetic shortcomings, according to the FTC. For instance, included testimonials said that the supplements could treat diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, and insomnia, and that the effectiveness of the skin repair serum was scientifically proven. In addition, FTC says the companies did not have appropriate safeguards to ensure the privacy of customers' genetic information, Social Security numbers, and bank account information.
As part of the proposed settlement, the companies would be barred from making claims that their products prevent, treat, or reduce the risk of any disease unless it is true and backed up by at least two well-controlled studies. In addition, any claim saying that a product treats or prevents a disease in someone with certain genetic variation has to be...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...