Scientists call for UN compromise on cloning
By Tim Radford, science editor,
The Guardian (UK)
| 08. 30. 2004
Britain's leading scientists today urge the United Nations to ban cloning of babies but leave open the door for cloning of embryo stem cells as treatments for so-far incurable illnesses.
Like the Inter Academy Panel, the umbrella body for the world's national science academies, the Royal Society wants an international ban on human reproductive cloning that would allow nations to make their own decisions about research using embryo tissue. The UN general assembly is to discuss a convention on human cloning in October.
After a series of free votes in Parliament, and years of public debate, Britain banned human cloning in 2001 but became the first nation to endorse the use of cells from embryos not needed for fertility treatment in other kinds of medical research. The Royal Society and 67 other science academies in effect want to prevent the bathwater from being thrown out with the baby.
"It is clear that if the convention bans all human cloning, the UK, and other countries which permit carefully regulated therapeutic cloning, will not sign up to it," said Richard Gardner, who...
Related Articles
By Antonio Regalado, MIT Technology Review | 03.30.2026
After operating in secrecy for years, a startup company called R3 Bio, in Richmond, California, suddenly shared details about its work last week—saying it had raised money to create nonsentient monkey “organ sacks” as an alternative to animal testing.
In...
By Deni Ellis Béchard, The Washington Post | 10.07.2025
In 1949, when John Gurdon was a 16-year-old boarding school student at Eton College in England, his teacher described his biology studies as “disastrous” and his scientific ambitions as “ridiculous.”
“If he can’t learn simple biological facts,” his term report...
By John H. Evans, Craig Callender, Neal K. Devaraj, Farren J. Isaacs, and Gregory E. Kaebnick, Issues in Science and Technology | 07.04.2025
The controversy around a ban on “mirror life” should lead to a more nuanced public conversation about how to manage the benefits and risks of precursor biotechnologies.
About five years ago, the five of us formed a discussion group to...
Riquet Mammoth Kakao (c.1920)
by Ludwig Hohlwein, Public Domain via Flickr
Colossal, the de-extinction company, scored headlines (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) recently by announcing that they had created mice! Not just any mice, not even colossal mice, but genetically engineered, normal-size “woolly mice” that are the result of editing seven genes in mouse embryos. This Colossal presented as an important step toward making a specimen of charismatic megafauna – a...
