Reproductive Embryo Editing: Attending to Justice
By Inmaculada De Melo-Martín,
The Hastings Center Report
| 08. 22. 2022
Advances in genome editing technologies allow scientists to add, remove, or alter genetic material at particular locations in the human genome. Genome editing of somatic cells offers great promise in the prevention and treatment of various human diseases. But these technologies could also be used to modify gametes and embryos. Some commentators defend gene editing for reproductive purposes on the ground that it would allow people who are at risk of transmitting genetic diseases to their offspring to have healthy and genetically related children.
Using gene editing in this way would require further research. The technology still presents problems involving off-target effects and reliability. Researchers must improve delivery to desired tissues and control of immunogenic reactions. Yet I argue here that, if we accept certain background claims about justice, accepting the goal of helping people have healthy and genetically related children should commit one to rejecting the investment of social resources into further development of reproductive embryo editing.
Considerations of justice are relevant to questions regarding the development of reproductive embryo editing for several reasons. First, decisions about research-funding priorities involve...
Related Articles
The Center for Genetics and Society is delighted to recommend the current edition of GMWatch Review – Number 589. UK-based GMWatch, a long-standing ally, was founded in 1998 by Jonathan Matthews as an independent organization seeking to counter the enormous corporate political power and propaganda of the GMO industry and its supporters. Matthews and Claire Robinson are its directors and managing editors.
CGS works to ensure that social justice, equity, human rights, and democratic governance are front...
If you’ve been online or caught the news in the past few weeks, you’ve probably come across Sydney Sweeney, her “great genes jeans,” and much debate over whether they reflect a resurgence of eugenics in American politics and culture.
In case you missed it, here’s what happened. At the end of July, US-based clothing company American Eagle released a new ad campaign. In one ad, Sweeney breathily recites the following, while lying back to zip up her jeans:
Genes are...
By Ryan Cross, Endpoints News | 08.19.2025
Human eggs are incredibly rare cells. The ovary typically produces only 400 mature eggs across a woman’s life. But biologists in George Church’s lab at Harvard University — a group that’s never content with nature’s limits — just got a...
By Staff, National Women's Law Center | 08.13.2025
INTRODUCTION
Baby bonuses. Motherhood medals. Fertility tracking. You may have heard of these policy proposals as solutions from the Trump administration to help encourage women to have more children.
Besides falling short of ensuring that people have what they need...
