Racial Alchemy
By Osagie K. Obasogie,
Bioethics Forum
| 05. 18. 2007
Bioethics and the Skin Tone Gene
Since the 2005 discovery that the SLC24A5 gene variant plays a sizable role in human skin pigmentation, scientists have become increasingly intrigued by the possibility of genetically manipulating skin color. Curiously, however, this research is going on with little mention of the dreaded “R” word: race.
A recent New Scientist article, for example, expends almost 3,000 words on the ins and outs of skin color’s genetic basis and apparent malleability without once mentioning race. The author eagerly notes, however, that “our skin color might one day become almost as easy to change as hair color is today, freeing us from the constraints of our genes [and] mak[ing] life far harder for those who still insist on judging people on the basis of a handful of gene variants.” Nina Jablonski’s 2006 book Skin: A Natural History devotes nearly 300 pages to understanding skin’s social, cultural, and biological significance without seriously engaging race’s long and tortured history; only two references to race appear in its index.
It is not uncommon for scientists to underestimate race’s relevance to their work. Stanford geneticist Gregory...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...