Opinion: ADA and the new eugenics
By Andrew J. Imparato and Anne C. Sommers,
Washington Examiner
| 08. 10. 2005
With the mapping of the human genome, potential for improving the quality of life for people with painful and degenerative conditions has brought new hope in many circles. To be sure, the prospect of cures and disease prevention has widespread appeal. Yet are we ready to use genetic engineering to prevent the birth of any baby with Down syndrome, dwarfism or genetic forms of deafness or mental health conditions? What about genetic predispositions for cancer or Alzheimer's disease? Who decides?
Last month America marked the 15th anniversary of the signing of the Americans with Disabilities Act, a landmark civil rights law recognizing that disability is a natural part of human diversity that in no way should limit a person's right to make choices, pursue meaningful careers and participate fully in all aspects of society.
The ADA stands in marked contrast to some deeply troubling U.S. history that some in today's biotechnology industry and many bioethicists have not completely abandoned.
At the turn of the 20th century, the cousin of Charles Darwin, Francis Galton, launched a pseudo-scientific movement known as "eugenics"...
Related Articles
By Jason Kehe, Wired | 04.11.2024
God help the babies! Or, absent God, a fertility startup called Orchid. It offers prospective parents a fantastical choice: Have a regular baby or have an Orchid baby. A regular baby might grow up and get cancer. Or be born...
By Jennifer Maas, Variety | 03.22.2024
“We Were Dangerous” is a surprisingly funny film for a movie whose central conflict is the sterilization of a group of young women on the fringes of society in 1950s New Zealand.
Knowing the project, which debuted at ...
By Antonio Regalado, MIT Technology Review | 03.20.2024
There is a new most expensive drug ever—a gene therapy that costs as much as a Brooklyn brownstone or a Miami mansion, and more than the average person will earn in a lifetime.
Lenmeldy is a gene treatment for metachromatic...
By Daniel Gilbert, The Washington Post | 03.07.2024
Vitaly Kushnir’s fertility clinic offers to screen an embryo to predict a baby’s sex, but the service can lead to ethically murky territory, like when a couple wanted it so their first child could be a boy.
But the couple...