Opinion: ADA and the new eugenics
By Andrew J. Imparato and Anne C. Sommers,
Washington Examiner
| 08. 10. 2005
With the mapping of the human genome, potential for improving the quality of life for people with painful and degenerative conditions has brought new hope in many circles. To be sure, the prospect of cures and disease prevention has widespread appeal. Yet are we ready to use genetic engineering to prevent the birth of any baby with Down syndrome, dwarfism or genetic forms of deafness or mental health conditions? What about genetic predispositions for cancer or Alzheimer's disease? Who decides?
Last month America marked the 15th anniversary of the signing of the Americans with Disabilities Act, a landmark civil rights law recognizing that disability is a natural part of human diversity that in no way should limit a person's right to make choices, pursue meaningful careers and participate fully in all aspects of society.
The ADA stands in marked contrast to some deeply troubling U.S. history that some in today's biotechnology industry and many bioethicists have not completely abandoned.
At the turn of the 20th century, the cousin of Charles Darwin, Francis Galton, launched a pseudo-scientific movement known as "eugenics"...
Related Articles
By Gina Kolata , The New York Times | 07.21.2026
Without fail, David Liu of the Broad Institute gets at least 20 messages every week from desperate parents. Their child, they’ll explain, has an ultrarare and devastating disorder caused by a mutant gene. Can he help them develop a gene...
By Abigail Ruhman , Association of Heath Care Journalists | 07.10.2026
The words reporters use and how publications tell stories can play a significant role in challenging ideas that are harmful to people with disabilities, according to a panel at HJ26.
Leading journalists and disability advocates said reporters and editors...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...
By Roxanne Khamsi, The Atlantic | 07.07.2026
When Ludivine Verboogen and Romain Alderweireldt’s third child was born in Belgium in late 2015, they marveled at his long fingers. Perhaps one day he will be a famous pianist, they thought. But soon Ludivine grew worried that her son...
