National Academies Will Meet to Guide 'Gene Editing' Research
By Lisa M. Krieger,
San Jose Mercury News
| 05. 18. 2015
Untitled Document
The debate over human "gene editing" has moved onto the national stage with a prestigious institute announcing it will hold an international summit this fall to create voluntary standards to guide the use of the controversial technology, first conceived by UC Berkeley molecular biologist Jennifer Doudna.
The landmark conference, announced Monday by the Washington, D.C.-based National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Medicine, will gather researchers and other experts to review and explore the scientific, ethical and social implications of the practice, which can "cut and paste" gene sequences.
Called CRISPR, an acronym for "clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats," Doudna's tool creates the prospect of a future with less sickness -- but could alter future generations -- influencing human evolution by changing the genes in reproductive cells.
The decision to hold a summit follows last month's news that Chinese researchers created the first genetically modified humans, altering nonviable embryos to try to fix the gene defect that causes beta thalassemia, a blood disease.
Doudna and colleagues, including Stanford University bioethicist Hank Greely, last month called for...
Related Articles
By Holly Baxter, The Independent | 08.19.2025
In rural Pennsylvania, I’m hiking through the forest with Simone and Malcom Collins and discussing the executive order they wrote for Donald Trump. Just outside their house — beyond the chicken coop, where they gather their eggs for homemade cakes...
By Jacob Bogage, The Washington Post | 09.03.2025
The conservative group behind the Project 2025 governing playbook for President Donald Trump’s second term is set to propose sweeping revisions to U.S. economic policy meant to encourage married heterosexual couples to have more children.
The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing...
By Dennis Sponer, BioSpace | 09.03.2025
Imagine telling a child with sickle cell disease that a cure exists—but it’s too expensive for their insurer to cover. That’s not a hypothetical. It’s the reality of gene therapy today: a revolutionary medical breakthrough caught in the bottleneck of...
By Tia Ghose, Live Science | 09.16.2025
Twenty-six years ago today, on Sept. 17, a teenager who had received an experimental gene therapy died. His death led to needed changes in the clinical trial process while also spurring skepticism that would ultimately stall the field of gene...