MPs urge Government to review regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing
By Science and Technology Committee,
UK Parliament
| 06. 22. 2021
The popularity of genomics tests sold directly to consumers has increased in recent years, with products focusing on ancestry, health outcomes and genetic traits. Today, the Science and Technology Committee publishes its Direct-to-consumer genomic testing Report, urging policymakers to seize opportunities and address risks posed by the increasing availability and scope of consumer genomic testing.
Drawing on evidence taken from genomic testing companies, healthcare professionals and think tanks, the Committee's Report makes a number of recommendations for the Government to consider when updating regulations, including:
- Pre-market assessment of direct-to-consumer tests by an independent body. This assessment should cover the test's clinical performance (the extent to which it can provide information about treatment of a disease, and the likelihood of improved outcomes) in addition to the current requirement to achieve analytical performance, which describes how well the test can identify the presence of a particular gene.
- The development of technical standards for direct-to-consumer genomic testing, enabling the data generated to be used and relied upon by Genomics England and the NHS. Clearly defining such standards would facilitate research efforts...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...
By Grace Won, KQED Forum [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...