Making US workers pass genetic test data to employers is wrong
By Martina Cornel,
New Scientist
| 03. 17. 2017
A proposed law effectively allowing US employers to require workers to take DNA tests and hand over the results is misguided
Letting companies require workers to have genetic tests and disclose the results sounds practically dystopian. But that’s the effect of a new congressional bill in the US.
Employees can refuse to comply, but risk being penalised by having to fork out thousands of dollars in extra health insurance payments – the threat of which might be enough to coerce them into going along with it.
This inflammatory proposal has been backed by Republican members of the House of Representatives Committee on Education and the Workforce.
With US employers funding a large chunk of employees’ health insurance, they may, understandably, want to rule out staff having certain health risks, which would in turn keep premiums down. Sure, genetic tests can quantify some of those risks. But the bill blows a huge hole in the principle that genetic testing should be voluntary and directly undermines the US Genetic Information and Non-Discrimination Act (GINA).
What’s more, many of the risk-reducing options...
Related Articles
By Pallab Gosh and Gwyndaf Hughes, BBC News | 06.26.2025
Work has begun on a controversial project to create the building blocks of human life from scratch, in what is believed to be a world first.
The research has been taboo until now because of concerns it could lead to...
Since the “CRISPR babies” scandal in 2018, no additional genetically modified babies are known to have been born. Now several techno-enthusiastic billionaires are setting up privately funded companies to genetically edit human embryos, with the explicit intention of creating genetically modified children.
Heritable genome editing remains prohibited by policies in the overwhelming majority of countries that have any relevant policy, and by a binding European treaty. Support for keeping it legally off limits is widespread, including among scientists...
By Ron Leuty, San Francisco Business Times | 06.16.2025
23andMe's two-step sale to a nonprofit led by former CEO Anne Wojcicki is nothing more than a dance around California's genetic privacy law, state Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a filing late Monday, one day before a judge will...
By Ed Cara, Gizmodo | 06.22.2025
In late May, several scientific organizations, including the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT), banded together to call for a 10-year moratorium on using CRISPR and related technologies to pursue human heritable germline editing. The declaration also outlined...