The Lessons of Asilomar for Today’s Science
By Alexander Capron,
The New York Times
| 05. 28. 2015
Untitled Document
There is a precedent for establishing internationally agreed-upon limits for new science, though it can be hard to do.
In 1973, scientists who were using novel molecular techniques to splice DNA between different organisms asked the National Academy of Sciences to consider the potential hazards as they might affect the public. In July 1974, an Academy-appointed committee publicly called for a large category of experiments to be suspended until leaders in the field could plan a way forward. Such a self-imposed moratorium on basic research was unprecedented, but it worked.
A hundred and fifty scientists and physicians from around the world gathered in February 1975 at the Asilomar conference center near Monterey, California, in what one scientist termed an amazing show of “self denial and social responsibility in the face of strong intellectual temptation” to continue the experiments.
The outcome of the meeting was equally impressive. Categories of experiments were graded by their riskiness: Some were deemed excessively dangerous and kept off-limits, while others were to be allowed once the appropriate biological and physical means of risk-containment had...
Related Articles
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...
By Roxanne Khamsi, The Atlantic | 07.07.2026
When Ludivine Verboogen and Romain Alderweireldt’s third child was born in Belgium in late 2015, they marveled at his long fingers. Perhaps one day he will be a famous pianist, they thought. But soon Ludivine grew worried that her son...
By Carl Zimmer and Marco Hernandez , The New York Times | 07.01.2026
Scientists have long dreamed of discovering the alchemy by which chemicals can be turned into life. On Wednesday, a team at the University of Minnesota announced that it had taken a major step toward that vision.
Blending together dozens of...
By Michael Le Page , New Scientist | 06.25.2026
We now know the master gene that controls embryonic development in people. Called NANOG, its role has been identified by making precise changes to the DNA of fertilised eggs using a technique called CRISPR base editing.
The discovery might lead...