Human-Subjects Research: The Ethics Squad
By Elie Dolgin,
Nature
| 10. 21. 2014
Stacy Hodgkinson and Amy Lewin had the best of intentions when they enrolled the pregnant 15-year-old in their study. The psychologists were evaluating an educational programme for young parents-to-be, and the teenager met all the inclusion criteria: she was 15–32 weeks pregnant with her first child, under 19 years of age, and her partner — who did not live with her — was willing to participate in the study. There was just one problem. Dad was 24 years old, and according to local laws he was guilty of child sexual abuse for sleeping with a minor.
The couple had apparently lied to each other about their ages, but not to Hodgkinson and Lewin, both then at the Children's National Health System in Washington DC. This presented a dilemma. The scientists had promised the participants that their information would be kept confidential. But did that trump their legal duty to report the crime to the police? And how would that affect the family?
“Here was a young father telling us he'd like to be involved in his child's life in a...
Related Articles
By Edward Chen, Nature | 07.28.2026
A small number of fertility clinics around the world are offering a controversial treatment: a procedure to furnish clients’ embryos with donated mitochondria as a way to increase the chances of taking home a baby.
The method, called mitochondrial replacement...
By Lauren Roberts, ABC News | 06.23.2026
Deanna Carr's early 20s looked very different to most people's.
"While everyone was travelling Europe and doing all those great things, I was hanging out in IVF clinics," she said.
"It felt very isolating. None of my friends were going...
By Tory Shepherd, The Guardian | 07.17.2026
Over eight years, Ethan and his wife went through nine rounds of IVF in Melbourne.
They travelled to Spain for two more, without success.
“I thought maybe the universe had decided we’re not supposed to have kids,” says Ethan, who...
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...