Higher Risks for Artificially Conceived Infants
By Miriam Zoll, <i>Biopolitical Times</i> guest contributor
| 03. 12. 2014
Data about the risks involved in high-tech assisted reproduction have until recently been scarce. The industry naturally touts success rates and downplays failures, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has largely been restricted to sharing only self-reported data from clinics with the public. But this is changing—and families intending to use these technologies should be aware of the full implications of the statistics that are available.
Last month, for instance, the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies announced that a record number of babies were born – 61,740 – as a result of the 165,172 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles performed at 379 of its member clinics in 2012.1
On the surface, this announcement may be perceived as an endorsement for the success of reproductive medical services that have, undoubtedly, helped many couples over the last 35 years to bear the children they might otherwise not have been able to. As we celebrate the births of these babies, however, it is also important to recognize that the vast majority of IVF cycles continue to fail, and that...
Related Articles
Reproductive rights have been a flashpoint in national politics for decades, with the stakes surging after the Supreme Court shredded the right to an abortion. In the current presidential campaign, the battle over abortion has swelled and morphed to encompass in vitro fertilization (IVF), which has now moved rapidly from widely accepted to partisan hot button.
This dramatic shift was highlighted by the February decision of the Alabama Supreme Court that granted personhood rights to frozen IVF embryos, signaling that...
By Annalee Armstrong, BioSpace | 09.11.2024
Complex gene therapies are starting to hit the market but all have faced the same reality: a tepid reception from the healthcare system and a cloudy path to profitability.
It can take about a year for a patient to go...
By Julia Brown, The Conversation | 08.16.2024
With their primary goal to advance scientific knowledge, most scientists are not trained or incentivized to think through the societal implications of the technologies they are developing. Even in genomic medicine, which is geared toward benefiting future patients, time and...
By Smriti Mallapaty, Nature | 09.11.2024
Under his microscope, Jun Wu could see several tiny spheres, each less than 1 millimetre wide. They looked just like human embryos: a dark cluster of cells surrounded by a cavity, and then another ring of cells.
But Wu, a...