Gene editing: Is era of designer humans getting closer?
By Fergus Walsh,
BBC
| 12. 03. 2015
[cites CGS' Marcy Darnovsky]
An international meeting of leading scientists has said it would be "irresponsible" to allow the creation of genetically altered humans.
But they said basic research involving embryo gene editing should continue in order to improve understanding of human biology.
As scientific knowledge advances and societal views evolve, they added, the clinical use of genetically modified embryos should be revisited on a "regular basis".
The gene editing summit in Washington was organised to discuss new techniques which enable researchers to alter human DNA.
Genetic enhancement has been a favourite theme for science fiction writers. The film Gattaca imagined a world where children were conceived through gene manipulation.
A Brave New World of designer humans - although still a long way off - has moved a step closer as a result new gene editing techniques.
Three years ago scientists invented a new simple cut-and-paste system, called CRISPR-Cas9, for editing DNA.
Scientists across the world immediately adopted this rapid, cheap and accessible tool in order to speed up their research.
For patients with blood, immune, muscle or skin disorders it offers the hope...
Related Articles
By Fyodor D. Urnov and Sadik H. Kassim, Nature | 04.21.2026
In February, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed a radical rethink of how scientists, physicians and manufacturers develop personalized genetic therapies. The regulator’s suggested introduction of a ‘plausible mechanism pathway’ should increase incentives for drug companies to develop...
By Miguel Muñoz, Cadena SER | 08.04.2026
"Para ellos, una familia numerosa no solo es una preferencia personal, sino que es una obligación. Creen que tener tantos hijos como sea posible es necesario para evitar un futuro apocalíptico", aseguraba Xavier Orri, periodista y cofundador de Página Internacional...
By Ryan Knutson and Jessica Mendoza, The Journal. | 03.27.2026
Genetically engineered babies are banned in the U.S. But that isn’t stopping Silicon Valley tech titans from trying to make one. In this final installment from The Journal’s investigation into the fringes of the fertility industry, WSJ’s Emily Glazer reports...
By Antonio Regalado, MIT Technology Review | 03.30.2026
After operating in secrecy for years, a startup company called R3 Bio, in Richmond, California, suddenly shared details about its work last week—saying it had raised money to create nonsentient monkey “organ sacks” as an alternative to animal testing.
In...