Fertility overload
By Marcy Darnovsky,
Riverside Press-Enterprise
| 03. 14. 2009
Legislators should tame the 'Wild West' of assisted reproduction
The recent birth of in vitro fertilized octuplets to Nadya Suleman, a Whittier woman, sent jaws dropping all over the world. Before long, another southern California controversy emerged: The Fertility Institutes in Los Angeles last month announced plans to not only screen in vitro fertilized embryos for gender, but also for eye and hair color.
Both events prompted widespread public concern and condemnation. Most fertility specialists expressed dismay about the irresponsibility of Michael Kamrava, the Beverly Hills doctor who helped create the eight-baby pregnancy. And outrage about the "designer-baby service" prompted The Fertility Institutes to suspend its offer, at least for now.
Millions of people have formed families through assisted reproduction, and its appropriate uses should be accessible. But, as the birth of Suleman's octuplets and The Fertility Institutes' "designer-baby" program demonstrate, assisted reproduction techniques can be terribly abused.
Multiple births -- even triplets and twins -- put mothers and babies at much greater risk than single births. Pre-ordering the sex or cosmetic traits of a child is a recipe for family discord and societal conflict. If parents pay a...
Related Articles
By Courtney Withers and Daryna Zadvirna, ABC News | 12.03.2025
Same-sex couples, single people, transgender and intersex West Australians will be able to access assisted reproductive technology (ART) and surrogacy, almost a decade after reforms were first promised.
The landmark legislation, which removes the requirement for people to demonstrate medical...
By Rachel Hall, The Guardian | 11.20.2025
Couples are needlessly going through IVF because male infertility is under-researched, with the NHS too often failing to diagnose treatable causes, leading experts have said.
Poor understanding among GPs and a lack of specialists and NHS testing means male infertility...
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...