FDA offers staff ‘agentic AI’ to support premarket reviews, administrative tasks
By Mario Aguilar,
Stat
| 12. 01. 2025
The Food and Drug Administration on Monday announced plans to offer its employees a broader set of artificial intelligence tools to use in premarket reviews and for other purposes amid persistent concerns that the technology can behave unpredictably.
The agency touts in a release that staff will now be able to use “agentic AI capabilities” to assist with “meeting management, pre-market reviews, review validation, post-market surveillance, inspections and compliance and administrative functions.” Agentic AI broadly refers to systems that can complete multistep tasks autonomously. The announcement says that the agency is employing “guidelines — including human oversight — to ensure reliable outcomes.”
Asked for more details about these guidelines, Ben Nichols, an FDA spokesperson, wrote in an email that the “agentic AI tools are exploratory” and that the AI does not make regulatory decisions or replace human judgement. “All outputs from AI are reviewed and validated” by FDA staff “before being incorporated into any official regulatory action, ensuring that the AI remains a support tool rather than a decision maker,” he wrote. (The FDA’s drug center alone has lost over 1,000 staff...
Related Articles
By Danny Finley, Bill of Health | 01.08.2026
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a unique funding structure among federal scientific and health agencies. The industries it regulates fund nearly half of its budget. The agency charges companies a user fee for each application
...
By Paula Siverino Bavio, BioNews | 01.12.2026
For more than ten years, gestational surrogacy in Uruguay existed in a state of legal latency: provided for by law, carefully regulated as an exception, yet without a single birth to make it real.
That situation changed with the arrival...
Following a long-standing CGS tradition, we present a selection of our favorite Biopolitical Times posts of the past year.
In 2025, we published up to four posts every month, written by 12 authors (staff, consultants and allies), some in collaboration and one simply credited to CGS.
These titles are presented in chronological order, except for three In Memoriam notices, which follow. Many more posts that are worth your time can be found in the archive. Scroll down and “VIEW...
By staff, Japan Times | 12.04.2025
Japan plans to introduce a ban with penalties on implanting a genome-edited fertilized human egg into the womb of a human or another animal amid concerns over "designer babies."
A government expert panel broadly approved a proposal, including the ban...