The ethics of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
By Laurie Udesky,
The Lancet
| 10. 23. 2010
A report into a 1-year investigation of genetic testing firms selling directly to consumers by the US General Accounting Office (GAO) concluded in July that test results were “misleading, and of little or no practical use”. As a result of the investigation, the US Food and Drug Administration is in the process of tightening regulations for firms that sell home genetic testing kits.
On their websites the direct-to-consumer genetic firms look authoritative: they encourage customers to consult their doctors or seek genetic counselling before and after results, ask customers to sign informed consent forms, and provide information on the ostensible scientific validity of the results they provide. But the GAO report describes how 15 companies responded to inquiries from five undercover consumers who had submitted their DNA samples for testing. GAO investigators found “egregious examples” of deceptive marketing, in addition to poor or non-existent advice from supposed consultation experts. The report also raised concerns about privacy: what happens to your DNA once you send it to a private company? All these issues raise ethical concerns about providing genetic testing directly...
Related Articles
By Fyodor D. Urnov and Sadik H. Kassim, Nature | 04.21.2026
In February, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed a radical rethink of how scientists, physicians and manufacturers develop personalized genetic therapies. The regulator’s suggested introduction of a ‘plausible mechanism pathway’ should increase incentives for drug companies to develop...
By Miguel Muñoz, Cadena SER | 08.04.2026
"Para ellos, una familia numerosa no solo es una preferencia personal, sino que es una obligación. Creen que tener tantos hijos como sea posible es necesario para evitar un futuro apocalíptico", aseguraba Xavier Orri, periodista y cofundador de Página Internacional...
By Mary Hartnett, WFYI | 03.30.2026
"1907 Indiana Eugenics Law" via Wikimedia Commons | CC by-SA 4.0
Indiana was the first government in the world to pass a eugenic sterilization law. The state sterilized 2,500 people from 1907-to-1974. Indiana apologized for implementing the program...
By Sarah Elizabeth Richards, Scientific American | 04.02.2026
For the past two decades, fertility specialists have wrestled with a troubling question: Why do Black people have lower live birth rates after in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment than white people?
Researchers have proposed several explanations, such as the fact...