The ethics of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
By Laurie Udesky,
The Lancet
| 10. 23. 2010
A report into a 1-year investigation of genetic testing firms selling directly to consumers by the US General Accounting Office (GAO) concluded in July that test results were “misleading, and of little or no practical use”. As a result of the investigation, the US Food and Drug Administration is in the process of tightening regulations for firms that sell home genetic testing kits.
On their websites the direct-to-consumer genetic firms look authoritative: they encourage customers to consult their doctors or seek genetic counselling before and after results, ask customers to sign informed consent forms, and provide information on the ostensible scientific validity of the results they provide. But the GAO report describes how 15 companies responded to inquiries from five undercover consumers who had submitted their DNA samples for testing. GAO investigators found “egregious examples” of deceptive marketing, in addition to poor or non-existent advice from supposed consultation experts. The report also raised concerns about privacy: what happens to your DNA once you send it to a private company? All these issues raise ethical concerns about providing genetic testing directly...
Related Articles
By Annika Inampudi, Science | 08.01.2025
In June, Sara* received a message asking whether she wanted to continue to participate in a massive, multicenter research project led by scientists at Aarhus University in Denmark. The iPsych study, the message said, had sequenced her genetic data from...
The Center for Genetics and Society is delighted to recommend the current edition of GMWatch Review – Number 589. UK-based GMWatch, a long-standing ally, was founded in 1998 by Jonathan Matthews as an independent organization seeking to counter the enormous corporate political power and propaganda of the GMO industry and its supporters. Matthews and Claire Robinson are its directors and managing editors.
CGS works to ensure that social justice, equity, human rights, and democratic governance are front...
By Ryan Cross, Endpoints News | 08.19.2025
Human eggs are incredibly rare cells. The ovary typically produces only 400 mature eggs across a woman’s life. But biologists in George Church’s lab at Harvard University — a group that’s never content with nature’s limits — just got a...
By Riley Beggin and Jeff Stein, The Washington Post | 08.03.2025
The White House does not plan to require health insurers to provide coverage for in vitro fertilization services, two people with knowledge of internal discussions said, even though the idea was one of President Donald Trump’s key campaign pledges.
Last...
