Editorial: Tangled loyalties at top of stem cell institute
By Sacramento Bee,
Sacramento Bee
| 11. 25. 2007
Behind conflict-of-interest controversy is real problem: The chairman's leadership
Internal conflicts have hurt and hampered the oversight committee of California's $3 billion stem cell institute since voters created it in 2004 by passing Proposition 71.
As designed by Robert Klein, the author of that initiative, a majority of this 29-member oversight committee consists of administrators and scientists whose institutions have a stake in the taxpayer money the board hands out for stem cell research.
Although members of the "Independent Citizens Oversight Committee" are required to abstain from all decisions that could directly affect them or their institutions, at least one has now been caught using back channels in an attempt to influence a major grant.
//
//]]>
John Reed, a respected scientist and oversight board member who heads the Burnham Institute in La Jolla, became disappointed earlier this year when the institute's staff ruled that a Burnham-affiliated researcher was ineligible to receive a $638,000 grant. Institute reviewers and the oversight board (with Reed abstaining) had already approved the grant, but the institute's staff later determined the researcher was not a full-time Burnham employee.
In an Aug...
Related Articles
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 05.24.2026
More than anything else in the world, Erin Millender longed to be a mother. She already had a day care picked out, a Pack ’n Play stashed in her basement. She’d tried Chinese pregnancy teas and midnight fertility ceremonies under...
By Calder Mchugh, Politico | 05.15.2026
There will come a time, in the not-so-distant future, when you decide to stick a computer chip in your brain.
At least, that’s what D. Scott Phoenix told the audience at TED 2026 in Vancouver last month.
“Someone you work...
By Nanette Elster, Kayhan Parsi, and Art Caplan, The American Journal of Bioethics | 05.06.2026
“Better babies.” “Fitter families.” “Survival of the fittest.” “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” These phrases are not merely historical reminders of the United States’ regrettable eugenic past but are appearing in an increasingly eugenic present. Eugenics may have seemed...
By Alex Aylward, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, and Gregory Radick , Heredity | 04.20.2026
Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it...