Editorial: Tangled loyalties at top of stem cell institute
By Sacramento Bee,
Sacramento Bee
| 11. 25. 2007
Behind conflict-of-interest controversy is real problem: The chairman's leadership
Internal conflicts have hurt and hampered the oversight committee of California's $3 billion stem cell institute since voters created it in 2004 by passing Proposition 71.
As designed by Robert Klein, the author of that initiative, a majority of this 29-member oversight committee consists of administrators and scientists whose institutions have a stake in the taxpayer money the board hands out for stem cell research.
Although members of the "Independent Citizens Oversight Committee" are required to abstain from all decisions that could directly affect them or their institutions, at least one has now been caught using back channels in an attempt to influence a major grant.
//
//]]>
John Reed, a respected scientist and oversight board member who heads the Burnham Institute in La Jolla, became disappointed earlier this year when the institute's staff ruled that a Burnham-affiliated researcher was ineligible to receive a $638,000 grant. Institute reviewers and the oversight board (with Reed abstaining) had already approved the grant, but the institute's staff later determined the researcher was not a full-time Burnham employee.
In an Aug...
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 09.25.2025
In the leadup to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to make IVF more accessible. He made the commitment central to his campaign, even referring to himself as the “father of IVF.” In his first month in office, Trump issued an executive order promising to expand IVF access. The order set a 90-day deadline for policy recommendations for “lowering costs and reducing barriers to IVF,” although it didn’t make any substantive reproductive healthcare policy changes.
The response to the...
By Jacob Bogage, The Washington Post | 09.03.2025
The conservative group behind the Project 2025 governing playbook for President Donald Trump’s second term is set to propose sweeping revisions to U.S. economic policy meant to encourage married heterosexual couples to have more children.
The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing...
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 08.21.2025
Less than two weeks after an Alabama Supreme Court decision upended in vitro fertilization in the state and prompted a national backlash, over 100 conservative congressional staff members and I.V.F. skeptics crammed into a meeting room a few blocks from...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 08.23.2025
For Erica L and her husband, in-vitro fertilization was the “nuclear option”.
After two years of trying to conceive, Erica and her husband had no idea why they could not have a baby. Doctors said only that they had “unexplained...