Editorial: Genome editing for all
By Editorial,
Nature Biotechnology
| 04. 08. 2014
CRISPR-Cas genome editing technology is attracting a growing cadre of devotees. In the past 18 months, over 125 papers on the technology have been published. At least three commercial ventures have been founded around the platform. And last month, the University of California (UC) Berkeley, UC San Francisco and the Li Ka Shing Foundation launched the $12-million Innovative Genomics Initiative (IGI), which seeks to accelerate adoption of the technology. According to its website, IGI will be dedicated to “a revolutionary method of genome engineering based on the transformative discovery of Cas9, a programmable DNA binding and cleaving enzyme.” So just how transformative is CRISPR-Cas likely to be?
CRISPR, short for clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats, is the name of a genomic locus in some bacteria and archaea that functions as an adaptive immune system against invading phage or plasmids. The locus encodes an endonuclease and stores snippets of foreign sequence, which are transcribed into RNAs that guide the endonuclease by base complementarity to cleave foreign nucleic acids at specific sequences. Type II CRISPR systems use the endonuclease Cas9 and...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...