DNA Bill Assaults our Liberties in R.I.
By Steven Brown and Mary McElroy,
Providence Journal
| 05. 22. 2014
The presumption of innocence lies at the heart of our system of criminal justice, but a bill that will soon be voted on by the Rhode Island House of Representatives deeply undercuts that presumption. The bill, H-7304, requires DNA samples to be taken from individuals who are merely arrested, but never convicted, for a wide array of crimes so that the samples can be placed in a national DNA database.
Even more troubling, the bill contains few protections for the many innocent people who will have their DNA samples taken. (The law already requires that a DNA sample be taken from any person convicted of a felony.) In some states with such laws, DNA samples are automatically expunged if the person is found innocent or the charges are dismissed. H-7304, however, requires the innocent person to go through numerous hoops to expunge a sample that really didn’t deserve to be taken in the first place.
Specifically, the aggrieved person must go to the trouble and expense of filing a formal court petition for expungement, serving notice of the petition upon...
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 09.25.2025
In the leadup to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to make IVF more accessible. He made the commitment central to his campaign, even referring to himself as the “father of IVF.” In his first month in office, Trump issued an executive order promising to expand IVF access. The order set a 90-day deadline for policy recommendations for “lowering costs and reducing barriers to IVF,” although it didn’t make any substantive reproductive healthcare policy changes.
The response to the...
By Jacob Bogage, The Washington Post | 09.03.2025
The conservative group behind the Project 2025 governing playbook for President Donald Trump’s second term is set to propose sweeping revisions to U.S. economic policy meant to encourage married heterosexual couples to have more children.
The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing...
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 08.21.2025
Less than two weeks after an Alabama Supreme Court decision upended in vitro fertilization in the state and prompted a national backlash, over 100 conservative congressional staff members and I.V.F. skeptics crammed into a meeting room a few blocks from...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 08.23.2025
For Erica L and her husband, in-vitro fertilization was the “nuclear option”.
After two years of trying to conceive, Erica and her husband had no idea why they could not have a baby. Doctors said only that they had “unexplained...
