DNA Bill Assaults our Liberties in R.I.
By Steven Brown and Mary McElroy,
Providence Journal
| 05. 22. 2014
The presumption of innocence lies at the heart of our system of criminal justice, but a bill that will soon be voted on by the Rhode Island House of Representatives deeply undercuts that presumption. The bill, H-7304, requires DNA samples to be taken from individuals who are merely arrested, but never convicted, for a wide array of crimes so that the samples can be placed in a national DNA database.
Even more troubling, the bill contains few protections for the many innocent people who will have their DNA samples taken. (The law already requires that a DNA sample be taken from any person convicted of a felony.) In some states with such laws, DNA samples are automatically expunged if the person is found innocent or the charges are dismissed. H-7304, however, requires the innocent person to go through numerous hoops to expunge a sample that really didn’t deserve to be taken in the first place.
Specifically, the aggrieved person must go to the trouble and expense of filing a formal court petition for expungement, serving notice of the petition upon...
Related Articles
By Katherine Long, Ben Foldy, and Lingling Wei, The Wall Street Journal | 12.13.2025
Inside a closed Los Angeles courtroom, something wasn’t right.
Clerks working for family court Judge Amy Pellman were reviewing routine surrogacy petitions when they spotted an unusual pattern: the same name, again and again.
A Chinese billionaire was seeking parental...
By David Jensen, The California Stem Cell Report | 12.11.2025
California’s stem cell and gene therapy agency today approved spending $207 million more on training and education, sidestepping the possibility of using the cash to directly support revolutionary research that has been slashed and endangered by the Trump administration.
Directors...
By Sarah Kliff, The New York Times | 12.10.2025
Micah Nerio had known since his early 30s that he wanted to be a father, even if he did not have a partner. He spent a decade saving up to pursue surrogacy, an expensive process where he would create embryos...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
