Controversial ‘3-Parent Baby’ Fertility Technique Fails to Deliver for Older Women
By Emily Mullin,
Medium One Zero [cites CGS' Marcy Darnovsky]
| 10. 15. 2019
The experimental procedure is banned in the United States but is being offered at clinics abroad as a treatment for infertility.
An experimental and much-hyped reproductive procedure that mixes DNA from three people is not effective at boosting the chances of having a baby for women ages 37 and older, according to doctors at a fertility clinic in Ukraine.
The technique, known as mitochondrial replacement therapy, involves taking a woman’s egg and shifting the majority of its DNA, known as the nucleus, into a hollowed-out donor egg. The shell of the donor egg contains healthy mitochondria, energy-making structures that have their own DNA. The resulting embryo ends up with DNA from the mother, father, and egg donor, so the technique is often referred to as “three-person IVF.” The procedure is controversial because many consider it a form of genetic manipulation.
Some fertility experts hoped that the younger mitochondria from the hollowed-out donor egg might rejuvenate the eggs of an infertile woman, thus increasing the chances of a successful pregnancy.
But new study results presented at a meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine in Philadelphia show that might not be the case. The three-person IVF procedure was found to be...
Related Articles
By George Janes, BioNews | 01.12.2026
A heart attack patient has become the first person to be treated in a clinical trial of an experimental gene therapy, which aims to strengthen blood vessels after coronary bypass surgery.
Coronary artery bypass surgery is performed to treat...
By Staff, ScienceDaily | 01.05.2026
Scientists at UNSW Sydney have developed a new form of CRISPR technology that could make gene therapy safer while also resolving a decades-long debate about how genes are switched off. The research shows that small chemical markers attached to DNA
...
Following a long-standing CGS tradition, we present a selection of our favorite Biopolitical Times posts of the past year.
In 2025, we published up to four posts every month, written by 12 authors (staff, consultants and allies), some in collaboration and one simply credited to CGS.
These titles are presented in chronological order, except for three In Memoriam notices, which follow. Many more posts that are worth your time can be found in the archive. Scroll down and “VIEW...
By Jonathan Matthews, GMWatch | 12.11.2025
In our first article in this series, we investigated the dark PR tactics that have accompanied Colossal Bioscience’s de-extinction disinformation campaign, in which transgenic cloned grey wolves have been showcased to the world as resurrected dire wolves – a...
