Controversial ‘3-Parent Baby’ Fertility Technique Fails to Deliver for Older Women
By Emily Mullin,
Medium One Zero [cites CGS' Marcy Darnovsky]
| 10. 15. 2019
The experimental procedure is banned in the United States but is being offered at clinics abroad as a treatment for infertility.
An experimental and much-hyped reproductive procedure that mixes DNA from three people is not effective at boosting the chances of having a baby for women ages 37 and older, according to doctors at a fertility clinic in Ukraine.
The technique, known as mitochondrial replacement therapy, involves taking a woman’s egg and shifting the majority of its DNA, known as the nucleus, into a hollowed-out donor egg. The shell of the donor egg contains healthy mitochondria, energy-making structures that have their own DNA. The resulting embryo ends up with DNA from the mother, father, and egg donor, so the technique is often referred to as “three-person IVF.” The procedure is controversial because many consider it a form of genetic manipulation.
Some fertility experts hoped that the younger mitochondria from the hollowed-out donor egg might rejuvenate the eggs of an infertile woman, thus increasing the chances of a successful pregnancy.
But new study results presented at a meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine in Philadelphia show that might not be the case. The three-person IVF procedure was found to be... see more
Related Articles
By Rob Stein, NPR | 01.15.2020
Researchers have conducted a controversial study that involved paying dozens of young women at a hospital near Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, to get artificially inseminated so their embryos could be flushed out of their bodies and analyzed for research purposes.
The...
By Krishanu Saha, J. Benjamin Hurlbut & Sheila Jasanoff , Scientific American | 01.15.2020
Senators Dianne Feinstein (D–Calif.), Marco Rubio (R–Fla.) and Jack Reed (D–R.I.) have introduced a resolution affirming the importance of heritage genome editing. The resolution is a valuable first step, and we urge the Senate to take it—and then to give this issue the democratic attention it deserves.
By Sarah Ruth Bates, WBUR Boston | 01.03.2020
Gene-editing technologies have huge potential to alleviate human suffering. But, like all very powerful technologies, they also carry enormous risks if used improperly.
By Sarah Elizabeth Richards, The New York Times | 12.21.2019
Egg freezing was supposed to be as revolutionary as birth control. It hasn’t lived up to the hype — but it has still changed women’s lives.
