Charles Halpern Letter to ICOC
By Charles Halpern
| 01. 03. 2005
Dear Members of the ICOC:
I reviewed the agenda for the January 6 meeting with concern and surprise. I find that the Bagley-Keene Open Meetings Act is still not being complied with and that the Committee is being invited to rush into the core of its work without having laid an appropriate foundation.
I write to encourage you to take charge of the mission of the Institute and to begin to function as a deliberative body, allowing due time for serious consideration of complex issues, with public involvement in the manner prescribed by California law.
I suggest that the ICOC take the following steps:
1. Clarify the scope of the program.
Though there is an unfortunate ambiguity in the intertwined provisions of Prop. 71, it is clear that the Institute for Regenerative Medicine is not limited to supporting embryonic stem cell research. It is authorized to support a broad range of medical research intended to cure or mitigate disease. How will the ICOC define the mandate? Will the construction grants that are likely to loom large in the first year's...
Related Articles
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
By Emily Mullin, Wired | 10.30.2025
In 2018, Chinese scientist He Jiankui shocked the world when he revealed that he had created the first gene-edited babies. Using Crispr, he tweaked the genes of three human embryos in an attempt to make them immune to HIV and...
By B.A. Parker & Gene Demby, NPR | 10.29.2025
What do conservatives like JD Vance and tech executives like Elon Musk have in common? They, like other pronatalists, want to “save civilization” by having more American babies. But it wasn’t that long ago that some people wanted to save...
By Jallicia A. Jolly, Sydney Curtis and Nicole Sessions, Ms. Magazine | 10.17.2025
Pronatalism is an old idea with roots in eugenics and nationalism, that is now fashionable among far-right influencers and policymakers. They talk of “moral decay” and see low birth rates as a threat to the future of humanity. In the mainstream media...
