Can Alondra Nelson Remake the Government’s Approach to Science and Tech?
By Nancy Scola,
Politico
| 04. 28. 2022
photo by Sage Ross
If Alondra Nelson has found the last few months head-spinning, she doesn’t let on. I ask if she finds it strange to be sitting here, the round rug near her feet emblazoned with the seal of the Executive Office of the President. “A little, sure,” she says.
It’s not that she’s the first Black woman to lead the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy in its 45-year history — or, at least, it’s not just that. Nelson is used to being around groups of people who look different from her. She grew up in science and tech, her mother a cryptographer.
It’s that Nelson’s a sociologist. This job shaping the United States’ mammoth, multi-trillion-dollar science and technology complex has been most often held by physicists. The pattern was tweaked only slightly by the last occupant of this office: a geneticist who abruptly resigned in February. Nelson’s still moving in, the only decoration on the 18-foot walls of this Eisenhower Executive Office Building space a poster-size photo of the James Webb Space Telescope gifted...
Related Articles
By Courtney Withers and Daryna Zadvirna, ABC News | 12.03.2025
Same-sex couples, single people, transgender and intersex West Australians will be able to access assisted reproductive technology (ART) and surrogacy, almost a decade after reforms were first promised.
The landmark legislation, which removes the requirement for people to demonstrate medical...
By Rachel Hall, The Guardian | 11.20.2025
Couples are needlessly going through IVF because male infertility is under-researched, with the NHS too often failing to diagnose treatable causes, leading experts have said.
Poor understanding among GPs and a lack of specialists and NHS testing means male infertility...
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...