California Supreme Court Upholds the State's Problematic Arrestee DNA Collection Law
By Jennifer Lynch, Electronic Frontier Foundation | 04. 02. 2018
In a disappointing and deeply divided opinion released today, the California Supreme Court upheld a state law law mandating DNA collection from arrestees. A lower court had held this law violated the privacy and search and seizure protections guaranteed under the California constitution. Today’s decision lets this flawed law stand.
The case, People v. Buza, involved a San Francisco man who challenged his conviction for refusing to provide a DNA sample after he was arrested. California law allows police to collect DNA from anyone arrested on suspicion of a felony—without a warrant or any finding by a judge that there was sufficient cause for the arrest. The state stores arrestees’ DNA samples indefinitely, and allows DNA profiles to be searched continuously by local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies.
EFF weighed in on the case in 2015, filing an amicus brief arguing the state’s constitution prohibits the collection of DNA from arrestees because of the severe impact DNA collection has on our right to privacy. Our DNA contains our entire genetic makeup—private and personal information that maps who we are, where we...
Related Articles
By Deepa V., Sarojini Nadimpally and Oshin Siao Bhatt, The Wire | 12.20.2018
The news of the passing of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016 on Wednesday in the Lok Sabha prompts us to revisit it yet again. Although regulation is valid, urgent and necessary, the Bill falls short on several counts.
According to...
The biggest biopolitical news of the year was also the most significant, as is not always the case. Despite the perpetrator’s hype, it was also apparently a failure.
The big shock was the revelation on the eve of the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing that the Chinese researcher He Jiankui had already (probably) “created CRISPR babies” – although the Summit was supposedly convened to discuss whether, when, how, and why scientists might make inheritable alterations in the human...
By
Marcy Darnovsky,
San Francisco Chronicle [cites CGS' Marcy Darnovsky] | 12.14.2018
California is being sued over its DNA collection practices, and the only thing that’s surprising is how long it took. In 2004, state voters passed Proposition 69, which requires authorities to collect DNA from anyone arrested for a felony. The...
By David Jensen, California Stem Cell Report | 12.09.2018
The California stem cell agency, state regulators and lawmakers are taking aim at the more than 100 dubious, unregulated "stem cell" clinics now operating in the Golden State.
The goal is to curb clinics that are using what they describe...
