Blinded By Science
By Center for Environmental Health,
Center for Environmental Health [Mentions CGS's Jessica Cussins]
| 09. 30. 2013
In this episode, three stories of science gone wrong: distorted science, unethical science, and just plain nutty science. We learn about geoengineering and take a geoengineering quiz—can you guess which is NOT a real proposal to cool the planet? Then we hear how companies that make flame retardant chemicals distorted a major scientific study—for decades. And science and human rights collide in the Grand Canyon.
Check out this episode
(download here, or subscribe via iTunes)
Jim Thomas and the ETC Group closely follow developments in geoengineering on their Hands Off Mother Earth campaign homepage. In this episode, Jim describes what happened when maverick geoengineer (and long-time con man) Russ George brought his ocean fertilization scheme to the Native people who live on Haida Gwaii, an island community off of the British Columbia coast. New Energy Times also has background on Russ George’s history of pseudo-science scams, and the Vancouver Sun has been following developments in Haida Gwaii.
Dr. Vyto Babrauskas was the first person to earn a PhD in fire science, and has been at the...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...