All in the Genes
By Marcy Darnovsky and Hank Greely,
Democracy
| 08. 31. 2008
Henry Greely inaccurately characterizes my organization, the Center for Genetics and Society, as "drawn to arguments against [inheritable human genetic enhancement] by the lure of naturalness" ["The Genetics of Fear," Issue #9].
I am not sure how Greely reached this conclusion. We explicitly ground our opposition in our commitments to social justice and equality. Procedures that produce (or claim to produce) genetically superior children for those with access to expensive technologies would all too likely exacerbate inequalities and lead to new forms of discrimination.
Greely seems enthusiastic about inheritable genetic modification, but he also recognizes that significant improvements are a long way off. He therefore dismisses proposals, such as the one offered by Jamie Metzl, for international agreements to prohibit socially undesirable human biotechnologies ["Brave New World War," Issue #8]. He disparages efforts at international regulation as "neither progressive nor wise," without mentioning that similar regulations are already in effect, and working well, in over four dozen countries. The United States should join this growing international consensus.
Greely warns ominously that regulating biotechnology "would almost certainly...
Related Articles
The Center for Genetics and Society mourns the loss of long-time colleague George Annas, who died on May 30. A remembrance at Bioethics Today calls George an “unwavering defender of human rights” and “a brilliant communicator, an intellectual pioneer, a polymath, devoted to justice for all, and a key figure in crossing boundaries in bioethics.” He is described as “a visionary health law pioneer” in an obituary posted by the Boston University School of Public Health, where he was the...
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 05.28.2025
An international group of gene editing leaders has put out a call for a 10-year ban on heritable human genome editing (HHGE), extending a moratorium that was first proposed in the fallout of a Chinese researcher’s widely decried use of...
Last week, May 21–23, a broad range of experts gathered in Boston to discuss the future of powerful biotechnologies with the potential to change what it means to be human. The fourth in a series of international Summits on human genome editing, this event was organized by the Global Observatory for Genome Editing, which “seeks to expand the range of questions arising at the frontiers of emerging biotechnologies … and fosters international, interdisciplinary, and cross-sectoral dialogue.” Like previous Summits...
By Caiwei Chen and Antonio Regalado , MIT Technology Review | 05.23.2025
Since the Chinese biophysicist He Jiankui was released from prison in 2022, he has sought to make a scientific comeback and to repair his reputation after a three-year incarceration for illegally creating the world’s first gene-edited children.
While he has...