Ad Campaign Fuels Debate On Breast-Cancer Gene Test
By Marilyn Chase,
Wall Street Journal
| 09. 11. 2007
A new direct-to-consumer ad campaign for a breast-cancer gene test is reigniting a debate over who really needs the test and whether it will induce low-risk women to take drastic measures to prevent the disease.
At issue is a series of ads to promote Myriad Genetics Inc.'s test for so-called BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 gene mutations. The mutations, while rare, signal a high risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer in affected women. Women who find they carry the mutations often take steps to lessen their risk. That can mean more frequent screenings and taking certain preventive drugs, but also can include prophylactic surgical removal of a woman's breasts or ovaries.
The gene tests aren't foolproof, however. And some experts worry that a campaign calling attention to a rare condition could create unnecessary fear -- sending thousands of healthy women with no family history of cancer into the doctor's office demanding tests that won't help them. Or lead others to a false sense of security about their results.
"Marketing has the capacity to raise public awareness -- a good...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...