News

Cathy Tie slips on a white lab coat bearing her name and the logo of her startup: Origin Genomics. "Welcome!" she says as she leads an NPR reporter, photographer and videographer on an exclusive tour of Origin's labs located...

This is the 17th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. The series is organized by Osagie K. Obasogie in...

THE INSTAGRAM POST, precision-guided by sex and age, had zeroed in on its target. Yuchen Tu is a conser­vatory-trained viola...

This is the 16th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring...

By Malcolm Ritter, The Washington Post | 01.20.2007

Say you're a woman who wants to have fertility treatment but can't afford the $5,000 to $6,000 cost.

What if...

By Amanda Paulson, Christian Science Monitor | 01.18.2007
In an era when infertile couples often look to test tubes or surrogate mothers to create children, the notion of...
By Sheryl Gay Stolberg, New York Times | 01.17.2007

WASHINGTON, Jan. 17 - President Bush on Wednesday urged Congress to pass long-stalled legislation to safeguard genetic privacy, a measure...

By Lonny Shavelson, Voice of America News | 01.17.2007

The quest to identify fetuses carrying potentially fatal genetic diseases got a powerful tool in the early 1990s, with the...

By Osagie K. Obasogie and Parita Shah, Seattle Post-Intelligencer | 01.17.2007

The Democrats' sweeping takeover of Congress and its "New Direction For America" put them in a position to give Americans...

Press Statement

(This statement can be attributed to Dr. Marcy Darnovsky, Associate Executive Director of the Center for Genetics and Society)

The stem cell research bill that is expected to pass the House of Representatives tomorrow is a welcome sign of significant bipartisan support on an issue that until now has been divisive. After its consideration by the Senate, we hope that President Bush will rethink his restrictive funding policy and sign the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act.

However, bipartisan support poses challenges for research advocates. At present, the United States lacks comprehensive oversight of stem cell research and other human biotechnologies. This glaring regulatory vacuum needs to be filled if the benefits of stem cell research are to be realized and its risks avoided.

In addition, the stem cell debate has been hampered by partisan polarization and overblown rhetoric. A more thoughtful approach is needed if the public and policy makers are to understand the benefits, risks, and implications of stem cell research. Among the important issues that will be discussed in coming weeks and months are the use of cloning techniques to derive stem cells, and the recently announced derivation of a new kind of stem cell from amniotic fluid.

We urgently need bipartisan support for more productive debate about stem cell research, and bipartisan initiatives directed at creating comprehensive oversight.

The Center for Genetics and Society is a public interest organization advocating responsible use and effective societal governance of the new human biotechnologies. It supports human embryonic stem cell research and public funding for it, but has raised concerns about the conduct, oversight, and implications of stem cell research. CGS has been a prominent critic of the $3-billion California stem cell research program.  For more information, see our website at www.genetics-and-society.org and our blog, Biopolitical Times, at www.biopoliticaltimes.org.


Contact: 
Marcy Darnovsky
510-625-0819 x305

By John Simpson, The Argus | 01.08.2007

A SO-CALLED "working group" of out-of-state scientists and patient advocate members of California's stem cell oversight committee goes behind closed...

By David Wahlberg, Chippewa.com | 01.07.2007
With Madison soon to have three fertility clinics, about a year after the near loss of its only one, the...