News

This is Ask An Expert, where every weekday at 9:20am, KCBS Radio is giving you direct access to top experts in various fields. Today: Gene-editing technology allows scientists to work with DNA in unprecedented ways, but there are larger scientific...

For months, a small company in San Francisco has been pursuing a secretive project: the birth of a genetically engineered baby.

Backed by OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman and his husband, along with Coinbase co-founder and CEO Brian Armstrong, the startup—called...

Pronatalism is an old idea with roots in eugenics and nationalism, that is now fashionable among far-right influencers and policymakers. They talk...

This is the 10th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring...

By Charles Seife, Scientific American | 11.27.2013
If there’s a gene for hubris, the 23andMe crew has certainly got it. Last Friday the U.S. Food and Drug...
By Erika Check Hayden, Nature | 11.27.2013
The drive to exploit the particular genetics of a patient's tumours to treat them is being complicated by a new...
By BBC, BBC News [Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky] | 11.26.2013

Google-backed 23andme has been ordered to "immediately discontinue" selling its saliva-collection tests after failing to provide information to back its...

Press Statement
23andMe advertisement featuring a male's upper facial features, of a left eye. He partially shown, against a plain white background.

The US Food and Drug Administration has ordered 23andMe to “immediately discontinue marketing” its direct-to-consumer genetic tests unless and until the agency grants it regulatory approval. In a warning letter released on November 25, the FDA states that 23andMe’s saliva collection kit and Personal Genome Service are medical devices, and that they therefore must have premarket approval in order to be legally sold. The agency cites numerous marketing claims on the Google-backed company’s website to demonstrate that 23andMe itself sees its products as medical in nature.

Center for Genetics and Society Executive Director Marcy Darnovsky, PhD, said today that the FDA’s letter is a welcome step toward establishing public oversight for the direct-to-consumer genetic testing industry. “Our society regulates medical products to protect public health,” Darnovsky said. “Without strong public oversight, we’re back to the era of snake oil.”

The FDA’s letter details 23andMe’s failure – in “more than 14 face-to-face and teleconference meetings, hundreds of email exchanges, and dozens of written communications” since July 2009 – to demonstrate that its product has been “analytically or clinically validated.” The agency notes that although 23andMe has recently initiated a new round of marketing campaigns – including television commercials launched this summer – the FDA “has not received any communication from 23andMe since May.”

“The FDA is clearly frustrated with 23andMe’s failures to cooperate,” said Darnovsky. “The public agency charged with protecting public health has finally lost patience with a private company that seems to think it doesn’t have to play by the rules.”

Many questions have been raised about the relevance and utility of direct-to-consumer genetic tests. Several studies, including one by the Government Accountability Office, have shown that reports on the same individual’s DNA from different DTC genetic testing companies can vary, sometimes dramatically. And despite claims by 23andMe CEO Anne Wojcicki that 23andMe is “revolutionizing health care,” many scientists now believe that an individual’s risks for the vast majority of common complex diseases cannot be predicted by DNA analysis – throwing doubt on the basic premise of the DTC genetic testing industry.

“For some conditions, genetic tests are medically crucial,” Darnovsky said. “But whenever a test claims to be delivering medically actionable results, there should be oversight to ensure that the information is factually correct, medical guidance to put the information in appropriate context, and care taken to ensure that the person on the receiving end understands it.”

# # #

The Center for Genetics and Society (CGS) is a non-profit public affairs and policy advocacy organization working to encourage responsible uses and effective societal governance of human genetic and reproductive biotechnologies.


Contact:
Marcy Darnovsky
1-510-625-0819 x305
mdarnovsky[AT]geneticsandsociety[DOT]org


 

By Callum Borchers, The Boston Globe | 11.25.2013
When a tumor grows on an organ, doctors remove it. When a hip stops working, they replace it. When a...
By Andrew Pollack, The New York Times | 11.25.2013
In a crackdown on genetic testing offered directly to consumers, the Food and Drug Administration is demanding that the Google-backed...
By Lukas Hartmann, ctrl+verlust | 11.25.2013
I signed up for 23andme in November 2010. I sent them my saliva and received a web login to my...
By J. P. Harpignies, Letter to the New York Times | 11.24.2013
To the Editor:

Adam Kirsch and Jennifer Szalai made some interesting points about Aldous Huxley in their Bookends essays (Nov...