Stem cell research: cutting-edge science or corporate subsidies, courtesy of voters?
By Capitol Weekly,
Capitol Weekly
| 09. 15. 2005
[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]
The organizations created to fund stem cell research in California announced
their first grants last week, despite the fact that the money is held up in
lawsuits. But are they rushing to further science or escape politics?
Last fall, voters approved a stem cell initiative, Proposition 71, by a
59-41 percent margin. Ten months later, the $3 billion in bonds voters
approved are tied up in lawsuits by Republican and anti-abortion groups who
oppose embryonic stem cell research.
Yet, in the long-run, the organizations created by Prop. 71--the Independent
Citizen_s Oversight Committee and the California Institute for Regenerative
Medicine--may have more to worry about from their original allies. A
coalition of Democratic skeptics has put forth a message more likely to gain
traction: You can support stem cell research and still oppose the results of
Prop. 71.
"The debate was framed as being a referendum on stem cell research and
whether you support President Bush," said Jesse Reynolds of the Center for
Genetics and Society. "California voters didn_t approve this as a corporate
subsidy."
Reynolds_ message has gotten support in...
Related Articles
By Teddy Rosenbluth, The New York Times | 02.09.2026
Dr. Mehmet Oz has urged Americans to get vaccinated against measles, one of the strongest endorsements of the vaccine yet from a top health official in the Trump administration, which has repeatedly undermined confidence in vaccine safety.
Dr. Oz, the...
By Ava Kofman, The New Yorker | 02.09.2026
1. The Surrogates
In the delicate jargon of the fertility industry, a woman who carries a child for someone else is said to be going on a “journey.” Kayla Elliott began hers in February, 2024, not long after she posted...
By Alex Polyakov, The Conversation | 02.09.2026
Prospective parents are being marketed genetic tests that claim to predict which IVF embryo will grow into the tallest, smartest or healthiest child.
But these tests cannot deliver what they promise. The benefits are likely minimal, while the risks to...
By Lauren Hammer Breslow and Vanessa Smith, Bill of Health | 01.28.2026
On Jan. 24, 2026, the New York Times reported that DNA sequences contributed by children and families to support a federal effort to understand adolescent brain development were later co-opted by other researchers and used to publish “race science”...