Stem cell research: cutting-edge science or corporate subsidies, courtesy of voters?
By Capitol Weekly,
Capitol Weekly
| 09. 15. 2005
[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]
The organizations created to fund stem cell research in California announced
their first grants last week, despite the fact that the money is held up in
lawsuits. But are they rushing to further science or escape politics?
Last fall, voters approved a stem cell initiative, Proposition 71, by a
59-41 percent margin. Ten months later, the $3 billion in bonds voters
approved are tied up in lawsuits by Republican and anti-abortion groups who
oppose embryonic stem cell research.
Yet, in the long-run, the organizations created by Prop. 71--the Independent
Citizen_s Oversight Committee and the California Institute for Regenerative
Medicine--may have more to worry about from their original allies. A
coalition of Democratic skeptics has put forth a message more likely to gain
traction: You can support stem cell research and still oppose the results of
Prop. 71.
"The debate was framed as being a referendum on stem cell research and
whether you support President Bush," said Jesse Reynolds of the Center for
Genetics and Society. "California voters didn_t approve this as a corporate
subsidy."
Reynolds_ message has gotten support in...
Related Articles
By Alondra Nelson, Science | 09.11.2025
In the United States, the summer of 2025 will be remembered as artificial intelligence’s (AI’s) cruel summer—a season when the unheeded risks and dangers of AI became undeniably clear. Recent months have made visible the stakes of the unchecked use...
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 09.25.2025
In the leadup to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to make IVF more accessible. He made the commitment central to his campaign, even referring to himself as the “father of IVF.” In his first month in office, Trump issued an executive order promising to expand IVF access. The order set a 90-day deadline for policy recommendations for “lowering costs and reducing barriers to IVF,” although it didn’t make any substantive reproductive healthcare policy changes.
The response to the...
By Johana Bhuiyan, The Guardian | 09.23.2025
In March 2021, a 25-year-old US citizen was traveling through Chicago’s Midway airport when they were stopped by US border patrol agents. Though charged with no crime, the 25-year-old was subjected to a cheek swab to collect their DNA, which...
By Julie Métraux, Mother Jones | 09.23.2025