Review seeks public views on baby sex selection [UK]
By The Guardian,
The Guardian
| 08. 16. 2005
The option for parents to select the sex of their next baby to balance their family is raised in a public consultation document published today.
The government said that its review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 1990 will seek views from the public on sex selection for non-medical purposes.
The review will ask whether the practice should be banned - as it is currently - or be allowed for family balancing reasons.
Sex selection is allowed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in order to avoid babies being born with disorders such as haemophilia.
But its use for family balancing was opposed by the fertility watchdog after a public consultation.
Now the government has raised the issue again in its wide-ranging consultation on fertility legislation, which has not been updated for 15 years.
The review will also consider, if sex selection was made more widely available, how many children of one gender should a couple already have before they are allowed to use screening techniques to try for a child of another gender.
Sex selection...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...
By Grace Won, KQED Forum [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
