Review seeks public views on baby sex selection [UK]
By The Guardian,
The Guardian
| 08. 16. 2005
The option for parents to select the sex of their next baby to balance their family is raised in a public consultation document published today.
The government said that its review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 1990 will seek views from the public on sex selection for non-medical purposes.
The review will ask whether the practice should be banned - as it is currently - or be allowed for family balancing reasons.
Sex selection is allowed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in order to avoid babies being born with disorders such as haemophilia.
But its use for family balancing was opposed by the fertility watchdog after a public consultation.
Now the government has raised the issue again in its wide-ranging consultation on fertility legislation, which has not been updated for 15 years.
The review will also consider, if sex selection was made more widely available, how many children of one gender should a couple already have before they are allowed to use screening techniques to try for a child of another gender.
Sex selection...
Related Articles
By Editorial Staff, The Guardian | 07.05.2026
Ever since Crispr-Cas9 gene-editing technology emerged in the early 2010s, ethical questions around genetically altered humans, so-called designer babies, have become increasingly urgent. There is already a worldwide legal prohibition. No country currently allows human germline editing (meaning genetic changes...
By Sarah Norcross, Sandy Starr, Amanda Cooney, and Anneliese Burton, BioNews | 07.06.2026
By Anna Louie Sussman, The New York Times | 07.01.2026
Birthrates in much of the developed world are at record lows, but there’s one demographic group that’s exploring new frontiers of fertility: ultrawealthy men. Deploying nearly limitless resources, a small number of them are reproducing at such an extraordinary scale...
By Emily Baumgaertner Nunn, The New York Times | 06.11.2026
When scientists at Columbia University announced they had used a newer technology to precisely edit the genes of human embryos last week, they set the academic community ablaze with debate. Is this good news or bad? How fast will...
