Re-Evaluating Risks and Benefits in Human Subjects Research
By Jonathan Kahn, Biopolitical Times guest contributor
| 05. 25. 2011
Modern bioethics is grounded in four basic principles: respect for persons (i.e. autonomy), beneficence, nonmalificence and justice. In a recent presentation at the 2011 ELSI Congress, "Exploring the ELSI Universe," Malia Fullerton, a professor in the Department of Bioethics & Humanities at the University of Washington School of Medicine, noted that "respect for persons" and "beneficence" have come to be the preeminent values in bioethical review of human subjects studies, particularly in the context of IRB review. Respect for persons typically manifests in a concern for informed consent, and beneficence in a concern for weighing the potential harms and benefits of research. Fullerton argued that a more balanced consideration of the other values, particularly justice and a concern for persons not just in terms of consent but in terms of dignity, needed to be incorporated into such review.
This got me to thinking about these concepts and their deployment in current biomedical research. Beneficence has often been cast in terms of balancing costs and benefits, as though it were simply a utilitarian calculus. However, in the context of...
Related Articles
The Center for Genetics and Society is delighted to recommend the current edition of GMWatch Review – Number 589. UK-based GMWatch, a long-standing ally, was founded in 1998 by Jonathan Matthews as an independent organization seeking to counter the enormous corporate political power and propaganda of the GMO industry and its supporters. Matthews and Claire Robinson are its directors and managing editors.
CGS works to ensure that social justice, equity, human rights, and democratic governance are front...
By Ryan Cross, Endpoints News | 08.19.2025
Human eggs are incredibly rare cells. The ovary typically produces only 400 mature eggs across a woman’s life. But biologists in George Church’s lab at Harvard University — a group that’s never content with nature’s limits — just got a...
By Katherine Drabiak, Journal of Medical Ethics Forum | 08.07.2025
Adapted from Mitochondrial DNA at
National Human Genome Research Institute
Recently, media outlets around the world have been reporting on children born from pronuclear genome transfer (sometimes called “3-parent IVF,” “mitochondrial donation” or “mitochondrial replacement therapy”) at Newcastle Fertility Center...
By Nicky Hudson, The Conversation | 08.12.2025
