Pluristem: Second Patient With ‘Life-Saving’ Cells Died
By David Wainer,
Business Week
| 11. 09. 2012
Pluristem Therapeutics Inc. (PSTI) said a second of the three patients given the company’s experimental stem cells has died after Pluristem touted the treatments as “life-saving.”
Pluristem shares soared after the Haifa, Israel-based company issued news releases in May, August and September announcing the treatments. Pluristem raised $34 million in a share sale in September without announcing that the first of those patients, a 7-year-old girl with a bone-marrow disease, had died. The company issued a press release today acknowledging the death of a second patient, though it wouldn’t say when the death occurred.
Pluristem sank the most in 21 months in Nasdaq Stock Market trading yesterday after Bloomberg News reported Pluristem hadn’t disclosed the girl’s death before the share sale. The company said today it wasn’t aware of her death at the time of the offering.
“The pediatric patient referred to in the Bloomberg article survived for six months, another patient survived for four months, and the third is still alive,” the company said in today’s statement. “Pluristem believes that these results exceeded longevity expectations. The unfortunate...
Related Articles
By Rachel Hall, The Guardian | 11.20.2025
Couples are needlessly going through IVF because male infertility is under-researched, with the NHS too often failing to diagnose treatable causes, leading experts have said.
Poor understanding among GPs and a lack of specialists and NHS testing means male infertility...
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
By Pam Belluck and Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 11.19.2025
Gene-editing therapies offer great hope for treating rare diseases, but they face big hurdles: the tremendous time and resources involved in devising a treatment that might only apply to a small number of patients.
A study published on Wednesday...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
