Letter to the Editor: Stem Cell Politics
By Richard Hayes,
New York Times
| 05. 01. 2006
To the Editor:
Re "Democrats Hope to Divide G.O.P. Over Stem Cells" (news article, April 24):
I'm a lifelong Democrat, pro-choice on abortion and in favor of stem cell research. But over-the-top promotion of this research is a mistake that could come back to bite us, and its use as a wedge issue is ill advised.
Stem cells may still prove to be a therapeutic dry hole. If successfully developed, stem cell therapies are likely to be prohibitively expensive.
Stem cell research puts women who donate eggs at significant medical risk, and could foster trafficking in eggs from poor women in developing countries.
The same stem cell technologies that might have beneficial medical applications could be used by rogue scientists intent on creating human clones and genetically modified children.
Stem cell research should be allowed, but it should proceed cautiously, under tight federal oversight.
Richard Hayes
Executive Director
Center for Genetics and Society
Oakland, Calif., April 24, 2006
Related Articles
By Anna Collinson and Jo Adnitt, BBC | 08.18.2026
At least 30 children, most of them British, are feared to have been conceived by IVF treatment in northern Cyprus using the wrong sperm or egg donors.
In each case, the parents suspect they did not get the donors they...
By Hamed Aleaziz, The New York Times | 08.13.2026
Immigrants at Ellis Island undergoing a medical inspection | Photo by The New York Public Library on Unsplash
In 1924, Congress sent a message to the world: We are no longer ready to take “your tired, your poor, your huddled...
What We Inherit by Sam Trejo and Daphne O. Martschenko; and Original Sin by Kathryn Paige Harden have a great deal in common, with substantial differences in style and emphasis. Both books attempt, in different ways, to show the reader just where current research into human genomics stands, where that might be going, and why the authors are interested. In short, the influence of genomic research on our societies is already large and seems likely to change them in ways...
By Dan Falk, Nautilus | 08.20.2026
The pseudoscience of eugenics, founded on the mistaken notion that nature envisions some “right” combination of genes, and that selective breeding can improve the human race, is making a comeback. While the heyday of eugenics was a century ago, the...
