Letter to the Editor: Stem Cell Politics
By Richard Hayes,
New York Times
| 05. 01. 2006
To the Editor:
Re "Democrats Hope to Divide G.O.P. Over Stem Cells" (news article, April 24):
I'm a lifelong Democrat, pro-choice on abortion and in favor of stem cell research. But over-the-top promotion of this research is a mistake that could come back to bite us, and its use as a wedge issue is ill advised.
Stem cells may still prove to be a therapeutic dry hole. If successfully developed, stem cell therapies are likely to be prohibitively expensive.
Stem cell research puts women who donate eggs at significant medical risk, and could foster trafficking in eggs from poor women in developing countries.
The same stem cell technologies that might have beneficial medical applications could be used by rogue scientists intent on creating human clones and genetically modified children.
Stem cell research should be allowed, but it should proceed cautiously, under tight federal oversight.
Richard Hayes
Executive Director
Center for Genetics and Society
Oakland, Calif., April 24, 2006
Related Articles
By Annika Inampudi, Science | 08.01.2025
In June, Sara* received a message asking whether she wanted to continue to participate in a massive, multicenter research project led by scientists at Aarhus University in Denmark. The iPsych study, the message said, had sequenced her genetic data from...
By Riley Beggin and Jeff Stein, The Washington Post | 08.03.2025
The White House does not plan to require health insurers to provide coverage for in vitro fertilization services, two people with knowledge of internal discussions said, even though the idea was one of President Donald Trump’s key campaign pledges.
Last...
By Harry Hunter, PET BioNews | 08.11.2025
The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology has announced plans to publish a POSTnote and called for submissions on surrogacy law in the UK and internationally.
The current UK surrogacy laws, largely based on legislation from the 1980s, have been...
By Sayantani DasGupta, MedPage Today | 08.05.2025
It's just a jeans ad.
It's not that deep.
It's just social media outrage.
Should physicians care about the recent American Eagle "Sydney Sweeney Has Good Genes Jeans" controversy? What, if anything, does the provocative campaign have to...
