Inequality and Human Genetics
By Richard Hayes, The New York Times | 09. 16. 2008
[Letter to the editor]
David Frum correctly acknowledges that income inequality in the United States has been growing steadily and that the use of genetic technology by the affluent to enhance the "intelligence, health, beauty and strength" of their offspring would exacerbate this trend. But his suggestion that this challenge could be addressed by somehow ensuring that all have access to such technology is woefully misguided. The advent of these technologies would spark a techno-eugenic rat race impossible to constrain absent some system of authoritarian, allocative control. It would fundamentally change the way people regard their children and one another and undermine the integrity of the common human nature that sustains all human values, beliefs and institutions. The genetic modification of our children is a practice that conservatives and liberals alike should be able to agree poses far more risks than benefits, and should be taken off the table as an option.
Richard Hayes
Executive Director
Center for Genetics and Society
Oakland, Calif.
Related Articles
At the end of 2018, Bill Gates, the multi-billionaire co-founder of Microsoft, used his personal blog to ruminate on “what’s going well and what isn’t with innovation in some areas where I work.”
The specific topics he addressed were Alzheimer’s disease, polio, energy, the next epidemic (probably flu), and gene editing – specifically, human germline gene editing. (Somatic gene editing, he notes, is less controversial.) Gates opens by referring to He Jiankui:
I agree with those who say this scientist...
Despite the appearance of agreement, scientists are not of the same mind about the ethics and governance of human germline editing. A careful review of public comments and published commentaries in top-tier science journals reveals marked differences in perspective. These...
By Roberto Andorno and Alicia Ely Yamin, Open Global Rights | 01.08.2019
The gene-editing scandal that made headlines in late November, with researcher He Jiankui claiming to have created twin girls whose DNA he had altered at the embryo stage, heightened global awareness of a consequential and close-at-hand decision about how...
By J. Benjamin Hurlbut, Nature | 01.02.2019
Leaders in the scientific community are urgently seeking to set international standards for producing genetically modified humans. They are reacting to November’s announcement by Chinese scientist He Jiankui, who claims that twin girls have been born carrying gene-editing changes He...
