How Brave New World Is Sneaking Up On Us
By John Farrell,
Forbes
| 02. 28. 2016
Untitled Document
Paul Knoepfler is not a scientist given to alarmism, but it’s pretty clear from his informative new book that the Brave New World is already upon us.
GMO Sapiens: the Life-Changing Science of Designer Babies provides a comprehensive overview of the state of the art science, and what headline-grabbing breakthroughs we can expect in the very near future, perhaps in less than a year.
Genetically modified human embryos are likely to be implanted and brought to term in the U.K., where three-parent IVF has been approved. This is a limited form of genetic manipulation, aimed to help couples where the mother would pass on certain diseases due to faulty genes in the mitochondria, the cell’s energy centers. In the process, the nucleus of the mother’s egg cell is transferred to replace the nucleus of a donor whose own egg cells contain healthy mitochondria. In this way the couple can avoid passing on the mother’s disease bearing genes.
In China, we may see human embryos modified using the controversial new CRISPR-Cas 9 technology to bring children to term, also...
Related Articles
By Rob Stein, NPR [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 08.06.2025
A Chinese scientist horrified the world in 2018 when he revealed he had secretly engineered the birth of the world's first gene-edited babies.
His work was reviled as reckless and unethical because, among other reasons, gene-editing was so new...
By Susanna Smith, Genetic Frontiers | 07.28.2025
Key Topics
How does the American far right view genetics and genetic technologies?
What is the history of the American cultural pursuit of trying to choose smarter children? What has science shown us about the relationship of heredity and intelligence...
By Arthur Caplan and James Tabery, Scientific American | 07.28.2025
An understandable ethics outcry greeted the June announcement of a software platform that offers aspiring parents “genetic optimization” of their embryos. Touted by Nucleus Genomics’ CEO Kian Sadeghi, the $5,999 service, dubbed “Nucleus Embryo,” promised optimization of...
By John H. Evans, Craig Callender, Neal K. Devaraj, Farren J. Isaacs, and Gregory E. Kaebnick, Issues in Science and Technology | 07.04.2025
The controversy around a ban on “mirror life” should lead to a more nuanced public conversation about how to manage the benefits and risks of precursor biotechnologies.
About five years ago, the five of us formed a discussion group to...