HIV Researchers Slam The Scientist Who Made Genetically Engineered Babies
By Nidhi Subbaraman,
BuzzFeed
| 11. 26. 2018
“I’m angry on behalf of the genetic engineering community. I’m angry on behalf of the HIV community,” one expert said. The researchers said that existing methods already offer parents simple ways to have children without transmitting the disease.
HIV researchers are incensed that the first reported use of gene editing in human embryos was aimed at conferring HIV immunity, criticizing the move as reckless and unnecessary.
The Associated Press reported Sunday that twin girls Lulu and Nana were born after a team led by He Jiankui of the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China, edited their genes when they were days-old embryos. Their father reportedly had HIV, and the procedure wiped out a gene that is usually necessary for the virus to infect cells. The news, first reported by MIT Technology Review, broke before the scientist had published any of his data, and was accompanied by YouTube videos in which He described his work.
Genetics experts immediately criticized the project as premature and said it risked conferring dangerous mutations to the twins.
Adding to that chorus, HIV researchers told BuzzFeed News that such a procedure doesn’t make sense for preventing HIV. Targeting and knocking out a single gene, as He claimed to do, does not offer resistance against all strains of the virus. What’s more,... see more
Related Articles
By Rob Stein, NPR | 01.15.2020
Researchers have conducted a controversial study that involved paying dozens of young women at a hospital near Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, to get artificially inseminated so their embryos could be flushed out of their bodies and analyzed for research purposes.
The...
By Krishanu Saha, J. Benjamin Hurlbut & Sheila Jasanoff , Scientific American | 01.15.2020
Senators Dianne Feinstein (D–Calif.), Marco Rubio (R–Fla.) and Jack Reed (D–R.I.) have introduced a resolution affirming the importance of heritage genome editing. The resolution is a valuable first step, and we urge the Senate to take it—and then to give this issue the democratic attention it deserves.
By Sarah Ruth Bates, WBUR Boston | 01.03.2020
Gene-editing technologies have huge potential to alleviate human suffering. But, like all very powerful technologies, they also carry enormous risks if used improperly.
By Sarah Elizabeth Richards, The New York Times | 12.21.2019
Egg freezing was supposed to be as revolutionary as birth control. It hasn’t lived up to the hype — but it has still changed women’s lives.
