HIV Researchers Slam The Scientist Who Made Genetically Engineered Babies
By Nidhi Subbaraman,
BuzzFeed
| 11. 26. 2018
“I’m angry on behalf of the genetic engineering community. I’m angry on behalf of the HIV community,” one expert said. The researchers said that existing methods already offer parents simple ways to have children without transmitting the disease.
HIV researchers are incensed that the first reported use of gene editing in human embryos was aimed at conferring HIV immunity, criticizing the move as reckless and unnecessary.
The Associated Press reported Sunday that twin girls Lulu and Nana were born after a team led by He Jiankui of the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China, edited their genes when they were days-old embryos. Their father reportedly had HIV, and the procedure wiped out a gene that is usually necessary for the virus to infect cells. The news, first reported by MIT Technology Review, broke before the scientist had published any of his data, and was accompanied by YouTube videos in which He described his work.
Genetics experts immediately criticized the project as premature and said it risked conferring dangerous mutations to the twins.
Adding to that chorus, HIV researchers told BuzzFeed News that such a procedure doesn’t make sense for preventing HIV. Targeting and knocking out a single gene, as He claimed to do, does not offer resistance against all strains of the virus. What’s more,... see more
Related Articles
By Hidde Boersma and Joost Bastmeijer, The Guardian | 11.18.2019
A radical experiment to genetically modify a strain of mosquito in order to stop them breeding malaria-carrying daughters is one of the latest efforts to tackle the deadly scourge of malaria.
At the start of this decade, the federal government called out consumer DNA testing as a burgeoning scam industry. Little did we know how it would explode in popularity.
By Nature Editorial Board, Nature | 11.20.2019
Science academies and the World Health Organization must act in unison. When the two groups report next year, they must speak with one voice and have more inclusive representation.
By Kelly Glass, Medium Elemental [cites CGS' Marcy Darnovsky] | 11.06.2019
New research suggest that costly extra services that "add on" to IVF lack evidence that they work.
