FDA Halts 23andMe Personal Genetic Tests
By Marcy Darnovsky; Jessica Cussins,
Medical Laboratory Observer
| 03. 10. 2014
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing gained notoriety in the autumn of 2008. That was when two prestigious publications, The New Yorker and The New York Times, featured largely positive accounts of a celebrity “spit party”—at which notables dressed in cocktail attire ejected their saliva into test tubes for genetic analysis.1,2
That trendy gathering seemed to be the leading edge of a new era of personalized medicine. Companies selling saliva kits online promised that the tests would give customers medically crucial information about risks for a wide range of diseases. Some observers enthused that DTC gene tests would revolutionize medical care.
But at least to date, the reality has fallen far short of such claims.
One major setback for the DTC gene test industry came in 2010, when the Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a stinging report3 after it had submitted identical DNA samples to four DTC gene testing companies and gotten back contradictory results. The GAO’s report called DTC gene tests “misleading and of little or no practical use.” The same year, when Pathway Genomics tried to sell a DTC...
Related Articles
By Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 06.04.2026
Scientists at Columbia University have edited the DNA of early human embryos with unprecedented accuracy, an achievement that could open the way to babies engineered with particular characteristics.
The prospect has fueled controversy for years. On the one hand, the...
By Alexandre Piquard, Le Monde [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 05.22.2026
"If proven to be safe, we believe preventive gene editing could be one of the most important health technologies of the century." This is how Lucas Harrington explained the goal of his company Preventive: to create genetically modified babies. Trying...
By Daniel Shanahan, Los Angeles Review of Books | 05.31.2026
This is the 15th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. You can read the first part here. The series...
By Sofia Resnick, Stateline | 05.20.2026
An anti-abortion group last month sued seven Utah fertility clinics, claiming their disposal of embryos as part of the in vitro fertilization process violates the state’s wrongful death law.
The ministry Voice for the Voiceless believes it has a strong...