Ethics of Gene Editing
By Betty Rollin,
KQED Religion & Ethics Newsweekly
| 07. 02. 2015
[with CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]
<span id="XinhaEditingPostion"></span>
A promising new medical technology has the potential to cure many genetic diseases by deleting or replacing defective genes. But ethicist Marcy Darnovsky of the Center for Genetics and Society is concerned about the safety of the technology, the unintended consequences of gene alteration for future generations, and the possibility of wealthy parents using the technology to “enhance” their children, regardless of medical necessity.
Image via WikiMedia Commons.
Related Articles
By Editorial Staff, The Guardian | 07.05.2026
Ever since Crispr-Cas9 gene-editing technology emerged in the early 2010s, ethical questions around genetically altered humans, so-called designer babies, have become increasingly urgent. There is already a worldwide legal prohibition. No country currently allows human germline editing (meaning genetic changes...
By Sarah Norcross, Sandy Starr, Amanda Cooney, and Anneliese Burton, BioNews | 07.06.2026
By Anna Louie Sussman, The New York Times | 07.01.2026
Birthrates in much of the developed world are at record lows, but there’s one demographic group that’s exploring new frontiers of fertility: ultrawealthy men. Deploying nearly limitless resources, a small number of them are reproducing at such an extraordinary scale...
By Emily Baumgaertner Nunn, The New York Times | 06.11.2026
When scientists at Columbia University announced they had used a newer technology to precisely edit the genes of human embryos last week, they set the academic community ablaze with debate. Is this good news or bad? How fast will...