Editorial: California shouldn’t keep DNA from hundreds of thousands of innocent people
By Chronicle Editorial Board,
San Francisco Chronicle [cites CGS' Marcy Darnovsky]
| 12. 14. 2018
California is being sued over its DNA collection practices, and the only thing that’s surprising is how long it took. In 2004, state voters passed Proposition 69, which requires authorities to collect DNA from anyone arrested for a felony. The person’s DNA profile is then uploaded to the national Combined DNA Index System.
Police and other law enforcement agencies around the country love the database, because it allows them to share information, generate leads, and connect the dots between crimes.
These are important functions, and DNA databases have been a breakthrough tool for law enforcement. In California, police agencies have used DNA databases to find the perpetrators of horrific crimes like the Gypsy Hill Killings.
But as we pointed out in 2004, there’s always been one huge flaw with Prop. 69: the size of the net it casts.
Prop. 69 requires DNA collection for anyone who’s been arrested for a felony, not convicted of a felony.
What that effectively means is that law enforcement agencies are allowed to keep the genetic profiles of thousands of people who have...
Related Articles
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Surrogacy360] | 03.29.2026
Without a federal law, surrogacy in the U.S. is governed by a patchwork of state regulations/
Why it matters: Confusing, varied local rules can determine everything from whether agreements are legally binding to who is recognized as a parent at...
Cathy Tie seems to be good at starting businesses but not so dedicated to maintaining them. CGS, like many others, first heard of her thanks to Caiwei Chen and Antonio Regalado in MIT Technology Review, May 2025, as the partner (perhaps bride) of the notorious Chinese scientist He Jiankui, described in the headline as “China’s Frankenstein.” He prefers “Chinese Darwin.” She ran his Twitter account for a while, contributing such gems as:
Get in luddite, we’re going gene editing...
By Judd Boaz and Elise Kinsella, ABC News | 03.17.2026
By Carolyn Riley Chapman and Nirvan Bhatia, Hastings Bioethics Forum | 03.12.2026
Last year, researchers saved an infant named KJ from a life-threatening rare metabolic disorder using a customized gene editing therapy. This was the first time that an individualized gene therapy was used to treat a human patient, and it has...
