Canada: Cloning, Sex Selection, Genetic Modification
By PricewaterhouseCoopers,
PricewaterhouseCoopers
| 03. 01. 2000
| Are opposed to scientists making a genetically identical copy of a human being.* |
~ 90
|
| Find it very or somewhat acceptable to clone human organs for transplants or tissue required to treat medical conditions. |
75
|
| Find cloning of human skin or other organs such as hearts and livers acceptable. |
> 80
|
| Find genetic engineering to preselect the sex of an unborn child unacceptable. |
80
|
| Find genetic engineering to change the eye colour or other physical features of an unborn child unacceptable. |
74
|
| Find it acceptable for scientists to use biotechnology to cure an inherited medical condition or to decrease the risk of illness. |
> 50
|
* When they explained why they opposed the cloning of whole human beings, about 42 percent said it was "simply unacceptable," and just less than 22 percent said cloning was unacceptable because it is too dangerous and has unknown consequences for humans. Of the 10 percent of Canadians who did not oppose cloning of entire human beings, most were men.
- Survey population: 2,580 Canadians aged 15 and older
- Date of survey: March 2000
- Margin...
Related Articles
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...
By Sarah Norcross, Sandy Starr, Amanda Cooney, and Anneliese Burton, BioNews | 07.06.2026
By Ashley Smart , Undark | 06.24.2026
As Edward Donnell Ivy remembers it, many of the sickle cell episodes he endured in his 20s were akin to headaches or colds: They hurt, but he could still get up and go.
Every so often, though, he would be gripped...
By Virginia Heffernan, The New Republic | 05.29.2026
Here and there, it’s been a good month for humanity—or “magnificas humanitas,” as Pope Leo XIV calls us poor featherless bipeds.
On May 25, the pope published his encyclical letter “on safeguarding the human person in the time of artificial...
